From: Anil Kaushik <anilkaushikwireless@gmail.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Cc: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org,
Anil Kaushik <anilkaushikwireless@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC] gtp: add 5G PDU Session Container (QFI) support?
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 13:40:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261002134002.3529706-1-anilkaushikwireless@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Pablo, Harald,
The in-tree GTP driver supports GTPv0 and GTPv1-U, but has no handling
for the 5G N3 PDU Session Container (PSC) extension header (type 0x85,
3GPP TS 29.281 / TS 38.415) that carries the QoS Flow Identifier (QFI).
drivers/net/gtp.c also still has the "TODO: Support for extension
header, sequence number and N-PDU" on the xmit path.
I'd like to add PSC/QFI support, but before writing the datapath code I
wanted to check two things with you.
1) Is this something you'd welcome in mainline gtp.c? I'm aware a lot of
5G user-plane work lives in out-of-tree datapaths (gtp5g, the eBPF
eUPF), so I don't want to add datapath complexity you'd rather not
carry here.
2) If yes: on RX, once the QFI has been parsed out of the PSC, what would
you like the driver to do with it? The options I see are:
- stash it in skb->mark, so tc/nftables can classify uplink traffic
by QoS flow;
- attach it as skb metadata (tc_skb_ext / metadata_dst); or
- just validate it and otherwise ignore it.
The shape of the RX patch depends on this, so I'd rather ask than
guess.
The plan would be a small incremental series:
1. add a GTPA_QFI (u8) netlink attribute + ynl spec, stored per PDP
context (control-plane plumbing only);
2. RX: parse the PSC extension header and extract the QFI;
3. TX: build the PSC from the per-PDP QFI on the downlink path (the
existing extension-header TODO).
Patch 1 is already written and builds; I'll post the series once I know
whether you want it in mainline and how you'd prefer the RX QFI to be
surfaced. Happy to adjust the approach.
Thanks,
Anil
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 13:40 Anil Kaushik [this message]
2026-10-03 5:58 ` [RFC] gtp: add 5G PDU Session Container (QFI) support? Harald Welte
2026-10-03 10:26 ` Anil Kaushik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261002134002.3529706-1-anilkaushikwireless@gmail.com \
--to=anilkaushikwireless@gmail.com \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox