From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [220.197.31.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D44683769EC for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2026 06:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.2 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791009580; cv=none; b=MyYar0sgMw3fmzFR5CAjy1ocH3s3c2bsD8oypVTc6KXWZ703Iym9NfXH5qwZO5Z0fhUwPQNsMhEPvdnRhiNX1FBkAZde0jLMp9eG8pjU8C91MQsmw2NX9fHd1n9h/WQSCqoop3M/48lUj+4saesBM7Z2vXF+GU4uL4LvmRk4fUs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791009580; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d/FKpiBScajN9aemqMkRdV7P8r4RaQq/XJffRmxWCSg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=QE57UU30L/rkMFtiRUi6iVhBcxmxZwxXC0TKOC5ahuHQOteBacvvMUgz8SXu9rAlbPm2F4xBTyMXN72LW7vufxsr0fGImP/C0RAMI+gfo+obWXiXyE8el5LCNspjefIfcssD4apvdYAsLnUq3UqvjR7SAlZuMaJ0joI4zOqMzqk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=gmEQZ0vU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.2 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="gmEQZ0vU" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=Se B4dWJ6m/M9VDzTXqCjMCkZ3GgM7VyFxEikcoO0r0M=; b=gmEQZ0vU2mtz8JVhwb mOa8y3t2ZC4JTL+yTIrTPGbBL9FwEFTrkvw2kWn5YmgXPZ/Kivkz66VX+aGFCe1b gkmnq9Nqg157fTOiL3XNbnYWcMC8GeM0DOmHejmfdiVjHVoMvn6fwqCiWrN9Pj17 SpvwwpjvMV9M6FABFlGetcM6s= Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown []) by gzga-smtp-mtada-g1-2 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wDXD0AEo8BqidfxCA--.46014S4; Sat, 03 Oct 2026 14:39:05 +0800 (CST) From: Rongguang Wei To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, jasowangio@gmail.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, Rongguang Wei Subject: [PATCH net v4 2/2] selftests: net: add TAP socket filter attach tests Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2026 14:38:59 +0800 Message-Id: <20261003063859.136895-3-clementwei90@163.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20261003063859.136895-1-clementwei90@163.com> References: <20261003063859.136895-1-clementwei90@163.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wDXD0AEo8BqidfxCA--.46014S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoW3JF45GF4rKry8Cry3urWUXFb_yoWxtw4fpa s5WayDGr1UWrW7Xws7ArW8uFWfAw4DGr1rZws5K3s8Zr4DJry5Ca9akFWSkFn2yrW8uws0 kFyaya45GwsIqFJanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jqeHDUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 5fohzv5qwzvxizq6il2tof0z/xtbC-Qm1IWrAowntMwAA3+ From: Rongguang Wei reattach_filter_without_user_buffer() attaches a filter, makes the buffer the program was copied from unreadable, detaches the queue and attaches it again. It then attaches a second queue from a fresh socket, which starts without a filter of its own, so a clear IFF_NOFILTER shows that the filter was installed again from the kernel copy. attach_filter_bad_len_keeps_program() checks that a rejected TUNATTACHFILTER leaves the installed program and the filter state that TUNGETIFF reports alone, and that a queue attached afterwards still gets the filter. attach_filter_nofilter_flag() and detach_filter_clears_reattach() cover the ways to attach a queue without a filter. Signed-off-by: Rongguang Wei --- tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 193 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c index abe488bac50b..cfaba5727402 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tun.c @@ -8,8 +8,10 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include +#include #include #include "kselftest_harness.h" @@ -542,6 +544,197 @@ TEST_F(tun, reattach_close_delete) EXPECT_EQ(tun_delete(self->ifname), 0); } +/* accept: return skb->len */ +static const struct sock_filter filter_accept[] = { + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_LEN, 0), + BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_K, 0), + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0), +}; + +/* Put the instructions in an anonymous mapping, so that the test can make the + * address unreadable afterwards. + */ +static void *filter_alloc(const struct sock_filter *insns, unsigned int len) +{ + void *p; + + p = mmap(NULL, getpagesize(), PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); + if (p == MAP_FAILED) + return NULL; + + memcpy(p, insns, len * sizeof(*insns)); + + return p; +} + +static int filter_attach(int fd, const struct sock_filter *insns, unsigned int len) +{ + struct sock_fprog fp = { + .len = len, + .filter = (struct sock_filter *)insns, + }; + + return ioctl(fd, TUNATTACHFILTER, (void *)&fp); +} + +static int filter_get(int fd, struct sock_fprog *fp) +{ + return ioctl(fd, TUNGETFILTER, (void *)fp); +} + +static int tun_get_iff_flags(int fd) +{ + struct ifreq ifr = { 0 }; + + if (ioctl(fd, TUNGETIFF, (void *)&ifr) < 0) + return -1; + + return ifr.ifr_flags; +} + +/* + * A queue can be attached long after the filter was configured, from a + * process that does not necessarily map the buffer the program was copied + * from, so the kernel has to keep its own copy of the program. Here the + * mapping is made unreadable before the queue is attached again, and a + * second queue is then attached from a fresh socket, which starts without a + * filter of its own. + */ +TEST_F(tun, reattach_filter_without_user_buffer) +{ + struct sock_fprog gf = { 0 }; + struct ifreq ifr = { 0 }; + short flags = 0; + void *prog; + int fd, ret; + + prog = filter_alloc(filter_accept, ARRAY_SIZE(filter_accept)); + ASSERT_NE(prog, NULL); + ASSERT_EQ(filter_attach(self->fd, prog, ARRAY_SIZE(filter_accept)), 0); + + EXPECT_EQ(tun_detach(self->fd, self->ifname), 0); + + /* The process that called TUNATTACHFILTER no longer maps this memory */ + ASSERT_EQ(mprotect(prog, getpagesize(), PROT_NONE), 0); + + ret = tun_attach(self->fd, self->ifname); + EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0); + + flags = tun_get_iff_flags(self->fd); + EXPECT_GE(flags, 0); + /* The queue is attached again, not left disabled */ + EXPECT_EQ(flags & IFF_DETACH_QUEUE, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(flags & IFF_NOFILTER, 0); + + EXPECT_EQ(filter_get(self->fd, &gf), 0); + EXPECT_EQ(gf.len, ARRAY_SIZE(filter_accept)); + + /* A new queue starts without a filter, so a clear IFF_NOFILTER shows + * that the filter was installed again from the kernel copy. + */ + fd = open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR); + ASSERT_GE(fd, 0); + + strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, self->ifname); + ifr.ifr_flags = IFF_TAP | IFF_MULTI_QUEUE; + EXPECT_GE(ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, (void *)&ifr), 0); + + flags = tun_get_iff_flags(fd); + EXPECT_GE(flags, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(flags & IFF_NOFILTER, 0); + + close(fd); + + ASSERT_EQ(mprotect(prog, getpagesize(), PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE), 0); + ASSERT_EQ(munmap(prog, getpagesize()), 0); +} + +/* A new queue attached with IFF_NOFILTER must not get the filter that is + * configured on the device. + */ +TEST_F(tun, attach_filter_nofilter_flag) +{ + struct ifreq ifr = { 0 }; + short flags = 0; + int fd; + + ASSERT_EQ(filter_attach(self->fd, filter_accept, ARRAY_SIZE(filter_accept)), 0); + + fd = open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR); + ASSERT_GE(fd, 0); + + strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, self->ifname); + ifr.ifr_flags = IFF_TAP | IFF_MULTI_QUEUE | IFF_NOFILTER; + EXPECT_GE(ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, (void *)&ifr), 0); + + flags = tun_get_iff_flags(fd); + EXPECT_GE(flags, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(flags & IFF_NOFILTER, IFF_NOFILTER); + + close(fd); +} + +/* After TUNDETACHFILTER a later attach must not install the filter again */ +TEST_F(tun, detach_filter_clears_reattach) +{ + short flags = 0; + + ASSERT_EQ(filter_attach(self->fd, filter_accept, ARRAY_SIZE(filter_accept)), 0); + EXPECT_EQ(ioctl(self->fd, TUNDETACHFILTER, 0), 0); + + flags = tun_get_iff_flags(self->fd); + EXPECT_GE(flags, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(flags & IFF_NOFILTER, IFF_NOFILTER); + + EXPECT_EQ(tun_detach(self->fd, self->ifname), 0); + EXPECT_EQ(tun_attach(self->fd, self->ifname), 0); + + flags = tun_get_iff_flags(self->fd); + EXPECT_GE(flags, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(flags & IFF_NOFILTER, IFF_NOFILTER); +} + +/* A TUNATTACHFILTER with a bad length must leave the installed program and the + * filter state that TUNGETIFF reports alone. + */ +TEST_F(tun, attach_filter_bad_len_keeps_program) +{ + struct sock_fprog gf = { 0 }; + struct ifreq ifr = { 0 }; + short flags = 0; + int fd; + + ASSERT_EQ(filter_attach(self->fd, filter_accept, ARRAY_SIZE(filter_accept)), 0); + + errno = 0; + EXPECT_EQ(filter_attach(self->fd, filter_accept, 0), -1); + EXPECT_EQ(errno, EINVAL); + + EXPECT_EQ(filter_get(self->fd, &gf), 0); + EXPECT_EQ(gf.len, ARRAY_SIZE(filter_accept)); + + flags = tun_get_iff_flags(self->fd); + EXPECT_GE(flags, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(flags & IFF_NOFILTER, 0); + + /* A queue attached afterwards still gets the filter, so the rejected + * ioctl left the saved program and filter_attached alone. + */ + fd = open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR); + ASSERT_GE(fd, 0); + + strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, self->ifname); + ifr.ifr_flags = IFF_TAP | IFF_MULTI_QUEUE; + EXPECT_GE(ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, (void *)&ifr), 0); + + flags = tun_get_iff_flags(fd); + EXPECT_GE(flags, 0); + EXPECT_EQ(flags & IFF_NOFILTER, 0); + + close(fd); +} + FIXTURE(tun_vnet_udptnl) { char ifname[IFNAMSIZ]; -- 2.25.1 No virus found Checked by Hillstone Network AntiVirus