Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: xiaoshoukui@gmail.com
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jmaloy@redhat.com, tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech,
	edumazet@google.com, w@1wt.eu,
	xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] tipc: fix memory leaks in bundle and fragment paths
Date: Sat,  3 Oct 2026 14:16:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261003141635.33711-1-xiaoshoukui@gmail.com> (raw)

From: xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@gmail.com>

In tipc_data_input(), recognized internal control message users (such
as MSG_BUNDLER, TUNNEL_PROTOCOL, MSG_FRAGMENTER, and BCAST_PROTOCOL)
return false WITHOUT releasing the skb via kfree_skb().

However, callers in the bundle extraction and fragment reassembly
receive paths currently ignore the return value of tipc_data_input().
This leads to memory leaks in the following scenarios:

1. Nested Bundle Path:
   When an outer MSG_BUNDLER message contains a structurally valid
   inner MSG_BUNDLER payload, tipc_msg_extract() allocates and
   extracts the inner skb. tipc_data_input() inspects the inner
   header, sees MSG_BUNDLER, and returns false without consuming or
   freeing the skb. Because the extraction loop ignores the return
   value, the inner skb is leaked.

2. Fragment Reassembly Path:
   When reassembly completes in tipc_buf_append(), the reassembled
   skb may carry msg_user == MSG_FRAGMENTER. tipc_data_input()
   inspects the reassembled skb, sees MSG_FRAGMENTER, and returns
   false without consuming or freeing it. The fragment completion path
   ignores the return value, leaking the reassembled skb.

Fix this by checking the return value of tipc_data_input() with
unlikely() in both receive paths and dropping unhandled skbs via
kfree_skb().

Hot-path disassembly verification confirms that adding unlikely()
preserves ideal branch layout. Benchmark evaluations under strict CPU
core isolation show no statistically significant throughput variation.

Fixes: c637c1035534 ("tipc: resolve race problem at unicast message reception")
Signed-off-by: xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@gmail.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
 - Added unlikely() annotations to low-probability error paths.
 - Reverted to kfree_skb() to align with existing TIPC module conventions
   and avoid 80-column line wrapping / checkpatch warnings.
 - Re-evaluated benchmarks with strict CPU affinity (taskset).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260916061220.798324-1-xiaoshoukui@gmail.com/

 net/tipc/link.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index 49dfc098d89b..dec72a2b113e 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -1306,15 +1306,18 @@ static int tipc_link_input(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		skb_queue_head_init(&tmpq);
 		l->stats.recv_bundles++;
 		l->stats.recv_bundled += msg_msgcnt(hdr);
-		while (tipc_msg_extract(skb, &iskb, &pos))
-			tipc_data_input(l, iskb, &tmpq);
+		while (tipc_msg_extract(skb, &iskb, &pos)) {
+			if (unlikely(!tipc_data_input(l, iskb, &tmpq)))
+				kfree_skb(iskb);
+		}
 		tipc_skb_queue_splice_tail(&tmpq, inputq);
 		return 0;
 	} else if (usr == MSG_FRAGMENTER) {
 		l->stats.recv_fragments++;
 		if (tipc_buf_append(reasm_skb, &skb)) {
 			l->stats.recv_fragmented++;
-			tipc_data_input(l, skb, inputq);
+			if (unlikely(!tipc_data_input(l, skb, inputq)))
+				kfree_skb(skb);
 		} else if (!*reasm_skb && !link_is_bc_rcvlink(l)) {
 			pr_warn_ratelimited("Unable to build fragment list\n");
 			return tipc_link_fsm_evt(l, LINK_FAILURE_EVT);
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-03 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-03 14:16 xiaoshoukui [this message]
2026-10-03 14:23 ` [PATCH net v2] tipc: fix memory leaks in bundle and fragment paths netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-05  1:49 ` Tung Quang Nguyen
2026-10-05 13:07   ` xiaoshoukui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261003141635.33711-1-xiaoshoukui@gmail.com \
    --to=xiaoshoukui@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tung.quang.nguyen@est.tech \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox