From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: "Amery Hung" <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@kernel.org>,
"Neal Cardwell" <ncardwell@google.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
"Tenzin Ukyab" <ukyab@berkeley.edu>,
"Clément Léger" <cleger@meta.com>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuni1840@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 07/10] tcp: Split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat().
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 19:24:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006192601.1875100-8-kuniyu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006192601.1875100-1-kuniyu@google.com>
We will add a kfunc for bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq()
to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat.
These hooks are triggered
* when the TCP stack enqueues an skb to sk->sk_receive_queue
* after data is dequeued from sk->sk_receive_queue
In the enqueue path, tcp_data_ready() is always called after
the hooks in tcp_queue_rcv() and tcp_ofo_queue().
If tcp_set_rcvlowat() were used as is, tcp_data_ready() could
be called twice for the same skb, which is redundant and also
confusing.
Let's split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat() and add a flag to control
wakeup behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
---
include/net/tcp.h | 1 +
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 12 +++++++++---
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index d95cbe4da96e..f7624ab9b420 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ void tcp_set_keepalive(struct sock *sk, int val);
void tcp_syn_ack_timeout(const struct request_sock *req);
int tcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
int flags);
+int __tcp_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val, bool wakeup);
int tcp_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val);
void tcp_set_rcvbuf(struct sock *sk, int val);
int tcp_set_window_clamp(struct sock *sk, int val);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 5d907a0a0461..c3c756a1ba8c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1827,8 +1827,7 @@ int tcp_peek_len(struct socket *sock)
return tcp_inq(sock->sk);
}
-/* Make sure sk_rcvbuf is big enough to satisfy SO_RCVLOWAT hint */
-int tcp_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
+int __tcp_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val, bool wakeup)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
int space, cap;
@@ -1841,7 +1840,8 @@ int tcp_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvlowat, val ? : 1);
/* Check if we need to signal EPOLLIN right now */
- tcp_data_ready(sk);
+ if (wakeup)
+ tcp_data_ready(sk);
if (sk->sk_userlocks & SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK)
return 0;
@@ -1856,6 +1856,12 @@ int tcp_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
return 0;
}
+/* Make sure sk_rcvbuf is big enough to satisfy SO_RCVLOWAT hint */
+int tcp_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
+{
+ return __tcp_set_rcvlowat(sk, val, true);
+}
+
void tcp_set_rcvbuf(struct sock *sk, int val)
{
tcp_set_window_clamp(sk, tcp_win_from_space(sk, val));
--
2.56.0.360.g66cac248cb-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 19:24 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: Add bpf_tcp_ops hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 01/10] bpf: tcp: Convert deny-list for bpf_{get,set}sockopt() to allow-list Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 23:09 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 02/10] bpf: tcp: Add a new per-socket flag and kfunc for bpf_tcp_ops Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:04 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 23:10 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 03/10] selftest: bpf: Use bpf_tcp_ops_set_flags() in bpf_tcp_ops_hdr.c Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:04 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 23:12 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 04/10] bpf: tcp: Guard fast-path bpf_tcp_ops_call() under per-socket flag Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 23:25 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-07 2:48 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-07 22:36 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-08 2:10 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 05/10] bpf: tcp: Check BPF_SOCK_OPS_TEST_FLAG() after cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 20:11 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-06 22:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-07 22:38 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 06/10] bpf: tcp: Introduce bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:06 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 23:26 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]
2026-10-07 22:43 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 07/10] tcp: Split out __tcp_set_rcvlowat() Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 08/10] bpf: mptcp: Don't support BPF_TCP_OPS_FLAG_RCVQ Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:06 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-07 22:43 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 09/10] bpf: tcp: Add kfunc to adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-07 23:06 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-07 23:21 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-07 23:42 ` Amery Hung
2026-10-06 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 10/10] selftest: bpf: Add test for bpf_tcp_ops.{enqueue,dequeue}_rcvq() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-06 22:06 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-07 13:11 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 00/10] bpf: Add bpf_tcp_ops hooks for TCP AutoLOWAT Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261006192601.1875100-8-kuniyu@google.com \
--to=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cleger@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=ukyab@berkeley.edu \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox