Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	horms@kernel.org
Cc: achender@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v4 0/2] net/rds: scope-aware sendmsg connection cache
Date: Wed,  7 Oct 2026 20:14:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261008031426.1142344-1-achender@kernel.org> (raw)

Hi all,

This is v4 of the sendmsg connection-cache scope fix (v1 at [1], v2 at
[2], v3 at [3]).

  Patch 1 gives the connected peer's link-local scope its own field.
  rds_connect() used to store it in rs_bound_scope_id, the scope of
  the socket's own bound address, which a later bind() to a
  non-link-local address resets to 0 and which a later connect()
  pollutes for a globally bound socket.  A send without a destination,
  getpeername() and recvmsg() now take the connected peer's scope from
  that field.

  Patch 2 compares c_dev_if with the request's scope in the cache-hit
  test, so the cache uses the same key as rds_conn_lookup().

Both were found by inspection while reworking this cache for the
connection-lifetime series on net-next; neither has been observed in
the field.  The misdelivery in patch 2 needs a socket that sends to
the same link-local address through two interfaces, and the stall in
patch 1 a connect()/bind() order that loses the peer's scope.

Changes since v3 [3]:
 - Patch 1: a destination-less send falls back to the bound scope for a
   non-link-local peer, so send() and sendto() to the connected peer
   compute the same scope (review of v3: a socket bound link-local and
   connected to a global peer stalled otherwise); getpeername() and
   recvmsg() report the connected peer's scope instead of the bound
   scope (review of v3).
 - Commit messages say how the issues were found.

Changes since v2 [2]:
 - The v2 "scope 0 matches anything" wildcard is gone; the
   destination-less send carries the connected peer's scope instead
   (new patch 1), and the comparison is exact.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260921215046.174745-1-achender@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260927062312.169097-1-achender@kernel.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261003163526.250805-1-achender@kernel.org/

Thank you,
Allison


Allison Henderson (2):
  net/rds: keep the connected peer's scope id apart from the bound one
  net/rds: include the scope id in the sendmsg connection cache check

 net/rds/af_rds.c | 15 +++++++++------
 net/rds/bind.c   |  4 ++--
 net/rds/rds.h    |  2 ++
 net/rds/recv.c   |  3 ++-
 net/rds/send.c   |  9 +++++++--
 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-08  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-08  3:14 Allison Henderson [this message]
2026-10-08  3:14 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] net/rds: keep the connected peer's scope id apart from the bound one Allison Henderson
2026-10-09 11:57   ` Simon Horman
2026-10-08  3:14 ` [PATCH net v4 2/2] net/rds: include the scope id in the sendmsg connection cache check Allison Henderson
2026-10-09 11:57   ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261008031426.1142344-1-achender@kernel.org \
    --to=achender@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox