Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jun Yang <juny24602@gmail.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	David Lee <david.lee@trailofbits.com>,
	Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>, Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>,
	stable@kernel.org, TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v4 2/2] sctp: re-point retained control chunks on association migration
Date: Fri,  9 Oct 2026 15:42:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009074244.3718-3-juny24602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009074244.3718-1-juny24602@gmail.com>

From: Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>

sctp_sock_migrate() transfers DATA chunk ownership but leaves retained
control chunks pointing at the old socket. A later retransmission can
therefore access the socket after it has been freed.

Extend the migration walk to cover retained control chunks and use
sctp_control_set_owner_w() to assign their new owner. Reuse the DATA
ownership check so each chunk is processed once per pass, even when it
is reachable through multiple lists or retained pointers.

Preserve a control chunk's existing authentication key across migration
so its final release can still generate SCTP_AUTH_FREE_KEY when needed.

Fixes: d04adf1b3551 ("sctp: reset owner sk for data chunks on out queues when migrating a sock")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: TencentOS Corvus AI <corvus@tencent.com>
Assisted-by: tencentos-corvus-ai:hy4-preview
Signed-off-by: Jun Yang <junvyyang@tencent.com>
---
A KASAN reproducer for this issue is available if requested.

v4:
 - Restore sctp_process_tx_chunk() to skip duplicate visits.
 - Preserve the control chunk's existing shared key.

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260926100359.78731-3-juny24602@gmail.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260804113705.45754-1-juny24602@gmail.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260730090537.27629-1-juny24602@gmail.com/

 include/net/sctp/sm.h    |  1 +
 net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c |  5 ++--
 net/sctp/socket.c        | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sm.h b/include/net/sctp/sm.h
index 3bfd261a53cc..76605d1ee839 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/sm.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/sm.h
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_fwdtsn(const struct sctp_association *asoc,
 				    struct sctp_fwdtsn_skip *skiplist);
 struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_auth(const struct sctp_association *asoc,
 				  __u16 key_id);
+void sctp_control_set_owner_w(struct sctp_chunk *chunk);
 struct sctp_chunk *sctp_make_strreset_req(const struct sctp_association *asoc,
 					  __u16 stream_num, __be16 *stream_list,
 					  bool out, bool in);
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
index 84a4c97d0f75..ddc31a5dbad3 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void sctp_control_release_owner(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	}
 }
 
-static void sctp_control_set_owner_w(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
+void sctp_control_set_owner_w(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
 {
 	struct sctp_association *asoc = chunk->asoc;
 	struct sk_buff *skb = chunk->skb;
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static void sctp_control_set_owner_w(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
 	 *  For now don't do anything for now.
 	 */
 	if (chunk->auth) {
-		chunk->shkey = asoc->shkey;
+		if (!chunk->shkey)
+			chunk->shkey = asoc->shkey;
 		sctp_auth_shkey_hold(chunk->shkey);
 	}
 	skb->sk = asoc ? asoc->base.sk : NULL;
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 4a08023d52aa..d09b9f139070 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -155,9 +155,24 @@ static void sctp_clear_owner_w(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
 
 static void sctp_set_owner_w_migrate(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
 {
-	sctp_set_owner_w(chunk);
-	if (chunk->shkey)
-		sctp_auth_shkey_release(chunk->shkey);
+	struct sctp_shared_key *shkey = chunk->shkey;
+
+	if (chunk->msg)
+		sctp_set_owner_w(chunk);
+	else
+		sctp_control_set_owner_w(chunk);
+
+	if (shkey)
+		sctp_auth_shkey_release(shkey);
+}
+
+static void sctp_process_tx_chunk(struct sctp_association *asoc,
+				  struct sctp_chunk *chunk, bool clear,
+				  void (*cb)(struct sctp_chunk *))
+{
+	if ((clear && asoc->base.sk == chunk->skb->sk) ||
+	    (!clear && asoc->base.sk != chunk->skb->sk))
+		cb(chunk);
 }
 
 #define traverse_and_process()	\
@@ -165,17 +180,14 @@ do {				\
 	msg = chunk->msg;	\
 	if (msg == prev_msg)	\
 		continue;	\
-	list_for_each_entry(c, &msg->chunks, frag_list) {	\
-		if ((clear && asoc->base.sk == c->skb->sk) ||	\
-		    (!clear && asoc->base.sk != c->skb->sk))	\
-			cb(c);	\
-	}			\
+	list_for_each_entry(c, &msg->chunks, frag_list)	\
+		sctp_process_tx_chunk(asoc, c, clear, cb);	\
 	prev_msg = msg;		\
 } while (0)
 
-static void sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(struct sctp_association *asoc,
-				       bool clear,
-				       void (*cb)(struct sctp_chunk *))
+static void sctp_for_each_tx_chunk(struct sctp_association *asoc,
+				   bool clear,
+				   void (*cb)(struct sctp_chunk *))
 
 {
 	struct sctp_datamsg *msg, *prev_msg = NULL;
@@ -198,6 +210,21 @@ static void sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(struct sctp_association *asoc,
 
 	list_for_each_entry(chunk, &q->out_chunk_list, list)
 		traverse_and_process();
+
+	list_for_each_entry(chunk, &q->control_chunk_list, list)
+		sctp_process_tx_chunk(asoc, chunk, clear, cb);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(chunk, &asoc->asconf_ack_list, transmitted_list)
+		sctp_process_tx_chunk(asoc, chunk, clear, cb);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(chunk, &asoc->addip_chunk_list, list)
+		sctp_process_tx_chunk(asoc, chunk, clear, cb);
+
+	if (asoc->strreset_chunk)
+		sctp_process_tx_chunk(asoc, asoc->strreset_chunk, clear, cb);
+
+	if (asoc->addip_last_asconf)
+		sctp_process_tx_chunk(asoc, asoc->addip_last_asconf, clear, cb);
 }
 
 static void sctp_for_each_rx_skb(struct sctp_association *asoc, struct sock *sk,
@@ -9640,9 +9667,9 @@ static int sctp_sock_migrate(struct sock *oldsk, struct sock *newsk,
 	 * paths won't try to lock it and then oldsk.
 	 */
 	lock_sock_nested(newsk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
-	sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(assoc, true, sctp_clear_owner_w);
+	sctp_for_each_tx_chunk(assoc, true, sctp_clear_owner_w);
 	sctp_assoc_migrate(assoc, newsk);
-	sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(assoc, false, sctp_set_owner_w_migrate);
+	sctp_for_each_tx_chunk(assoc, false, sctp_set_owner_w_migrate);
 
 	/* If the association on the newsk is already closed before accept()
 	 * is called, set RCV_SHUTDOWN flag.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09  7:42 [PATCH net v4 0/2] sctp: re-point retained control chunks on association migration Jun Yang
2026-10-09  7:42 ` [PATCH net v4 1/2] sctp: hold shkey across socket migration Jun Yang
2026-10-09  7:42 ` Jun Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261009074244.3718-3-juny24602@gmail.com \
    --to=juny24602@gmail.com \
    --cc=corvus@tencent.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david.lee@trailofbits.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=junvyyang@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kylebot@openai.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox