From: Andre Ziviani <andrepziviani@gmail.com>
To: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Gaoyang Wei <yhyxwgy@gmail.com>,
Ziyou Xu <xuziyougm@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Larsson <benjamin.larsson@genexis.eu>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 00/12] net: add the PON subsystem
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 08:04:28 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261009110428.55471-1-andrepziviani@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261008143249.3439762-1-john@phrozen.org>
Hi John,
On Thu, Oct 08, 2026 at 04:32:37PM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> The scope is XGS-PON. The mode enum keeps gpon and xg-pon so that the
> uapi order stays clean for later drivers.
A G-PON data point, since the framework thread mentioned Realtek only
as work with proprietary components. odi-oss [1] is open firmware for a
GPON SFP ONU stick on the Realtek RTL9602C. It runs mainline 6.18 with
GPL drivers of our own for the GPON MAC, the PLOAM state machine of
G.984.3, the CPU NIC and the switch, and with a userspace OMCI daemon.
Apart from the stock bootloader, the image has no vendor code or
binaries. It runs in production on two ISPs, and a user has it working
on a third.
I should be upfront: I am not a PON or kernel expert. The drivers were
written with an AI coding assistant, working from the ITU-T
recommendations and from register traces of the stock firmware, and
checked by trial and error on my own sticks against live OLTs. So take
what follows as field data from one G-PON implementation, not as
review from someone who knows the standards well. Corrections are very
welcome.
Our split is already the one this series takes: PLOAM in the MAC driver,
OMCI in userspace over netlink (a private family for now). So our G-PON
driver should be able to sit on net/pon, as a second MAC and a first
G-PON one, at least out of tree (the RTL9602C platform itself is not
upstream). Reading the series with that in mind, four things would get
in the way:
1. The activation edges. pon_state_legal[] is one table for every mode,
and the comment says a per-mode split can wait for a second MAC. Our
state machine follows G.984.3 Table 10-1, and five of its edges are
not in the table:
O3 -> O2 TO1 expires in Serial_Number
O5 -> O2 Deactivate_ONU-ID in Operation (O6 -> O2 too)
O6 -> O4 broadcast POPUP
O6 -> O7 Disable_Serial_Number in POPUP
O7 -> O2 Disable_Serial_Number "enable"; G.9807.1 goes to O1
Each would be published with a warning on every occurrence. A table
per mode, selected by the device mode, would fix it.
2. GEM port ids. The spec takes 1021 to 65534, the XGEM Port-ID range. A
G-PON Port-ID is 12 bits. The operator with six GEM ports mentioned
above assigns 269 to 909, and ours on the other ISP 1434 to 1946.
The range would need to depend on the mode too.
3. The datapath of an SFP ONU. Service traffic never reaches the CPU on
this stick. The switch bridges the host SerDes and the PON in
hardware, and our OMCI daemon programs it from the MIB: GEM flows,
upstream queues and VLAN treatment from the Extended VLAN Tagging ME.
Only OMCI goes through the CPU NIC: received frames carry a trap
reason in the RX descriptor, and we send with per-frame descriptor
words (port and GEM stream). So OMCI fits the conduit contract well,
but there is no data netdev to pair and nothing to bridge in Linux.
Can a driver own the T-CONT, GEM and gem-map objects and offload
them without a data netdev or GEM netdevs? The VLAN rules we need
also go beyond tag/vid/pbit/dscp (double-tag rules, TPID, the
treatment side), but that may belong to switchdev rather than here.
4. Observing OMCI. omci-ntf goes to the one registered socket. Being able
to watch the exchange without taking over the channel, as Benjamin and
Ziyou asked in the earlier thread, is what we use most when an OLT
behaves oddly. A read-only multicast copy of the PDUs in both
directions would cover it.
One small note for the docs: baseline G-PON OMCI ends with a CRC-32
trailer, not a MIC. On the RTL9602C neither direction is checked or
added by the MAC, so our driver would compute it in software. That fits
the current pdu attribute; the docs could just name the G-PON trailer
alongside the MIC.
If a per-mode state table and Port-ID range are acceptable, I can port
our driver onto the series and report back. I can also share PLOAM
traces from both ISPs.
[1] https://github.com/AndreZiviani/odi-oss
Thanks,
Andre Ziviani
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-08 14:32 [RFC net-next 00/12] net: add the PON subsystem John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 01/12] net: pon: add the netlink specification of the pon family John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 02/12] net: add a PON device pointer to struct net_device John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 03/12] net: pon: add the PLOAM vocabulary and message codec John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 04/12] net: pon: add the device state and the lent context John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 05/12] net: pon: add the conduit contract John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 06/12] net: pon: add the GEM network devices John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 07/12] net: pon: add the OMCI channel John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 08/12] net: pon: add netlink support John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 09/12] net: pon: add the device registration John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 10/12] net: pon: build the PON subsystem John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 11/12] Documentation: networking: describe " John Crispin
2026-10-08 14:32 ` [RFC net-next 12/12] MAINTAINERS: add " John Crispin
2026-10-09 2:27 ` [RFC net-next 00/12] net: " Gaoyang Wei
2026-10-09 11:04 ` Andre Ziviani [this message]
2026-10-09 12:11 ` John Crispin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-10-09 13:39 Stephan Pruecklmayer
2026-10-09 13:45 Stephan Pruecklmayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261009110428.55471-1-andrepziviani@gmail.com \
--to=andrepziviani@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=benjamin.larsson@genexis.eu \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=xuziyougm@gmail.com \
--cc=yhyxwgy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox