From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@kernel.org, horms@kernel.org,
fw@strlen.de, ja@ssi.bg
Subject: [PATCH net-next 10/15] netfilter: conntrack: fix unlikely UaF in gc worker
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 23:59:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261011215953.1334630-11-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011215953.1334630-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
When early-drop scan is enabled, gc_worker() reads tmp->ct_net, resolves
cnet with nf_ct_pernet(), and reads cnet->count with RCU read lock held but
before acquiring a reference to tmp.
Its unlikely but possible that the worker gets preempted before reading
cnet->count while nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list manages to unlink all
conntracks and returns in the mean time.
This allows for the pernet memory to get free'd.
On resume, use after free would occur when the worker reads cnet->count.
This can be solved either via another synchronize_rcu() in
nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list or via cheaper flush_work(). If work
wasn't running no race can happen as next call cannot observe
already-unlinked conntrack objects.
This is an LLM finding with no reproducer, but it appears to be correct.
Fixes: c6dd940b1f74 ("netfilter: allow early drop of assured conntracks")
Reported-by: Vega <vega@nebusec.ai>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index f9b8927327ba..4c4ca15dfd37 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -2506,6 +2506,11 @@ void nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list(struct list_head *net_exit_list)
goto i_see_dead_people;
}
+ /* must wait for current scan loop, worker also looks at
+ * struct nf_conntrack_net, which is about to be free'd.
+ */
+ flush_work(&conntrack_gc_work.dwork.work);
+
list_for_each_entry(net, net_exit_list, exit_list) {
warn_on_keymap_list_leak(net);
nf_conntrack_ecache_pernet_fini(net);
--
2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 21:59 [PATCH net-next 00/15] Netfilter/IPVS updates for net-next Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] netfilter: disable br_netfilter in user namespaces Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] netfilter: flowtable: recognize IPv4/IPv6 in tunnel proto matching Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] netfilter: flowtable: set inner protocol when popping tunnel header Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] netfilter: flowtable: populate tunnel tuple regardless of inner protocol Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] netfilter: flowtable: add encap_proto to flow_offload_tunnel Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] netfilter: flowtable: refactor MTU check for tunnel offload Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] netfilter: flowtable: unify tunnel push for IPv4 and IPv6 Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] selftests: netfilter: nft_queue.sh: only queue icmp echo request/reply Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] ipvs: fix buffer overflow when sending sync messages Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] netfilter: nf_tables: switch chain_types array to rcu Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] netfilter: add nf_skb_sk helper and use it Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] netfilter: add nf_sk_to_full_sk " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] netfilter: nft_exthdr: remove redundant op parsing in tcp_set_init Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-10-11 21:59 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] netfilter: nft_exthdr: avoid 60 bytes stack buffer in TCP option mangling Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261011215953.1334630-11-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox