Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, j-rameshbabu@ti.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, c-vankar@ti.com, danishanwar@ti.com,
	d-qiu@ti.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	fmaurer@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, neelima@ti.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, praneeth@ti.com, pratheesh@ti.com,
	richardcochran@gmail.com, horms@kernel.org, vigneshr@ti.com,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 4/8] hsr: Drop received PTP packets
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 16:49:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012144903.EysNyyNj@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179129707723.434549.4053379151333278960@kernel.org>

On 2026-10-06 14:31:17 [+0000], netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> [Severity: Medium]
> The commit message says:
> 
>     Drop all received PTP packets.
> 
> Do these checks catch PTP carried over UDP? Both branches only match
> ETH_P_1588, which is the Layer 2 mapping.
> 
> PTP over UDP/IPv4 or IPv6 (ports 319/320) has ETH_P_IP or ETH_P_IPV6 in
…
> UDP PTP behaves the same as it did before this patch, and the IEC 62439-3
> PTP profile for HSR/PRP uses the L2 mapping. Still, the commit message
> names only VLAN-tagged packets as out of scope. The new comment also
> states the policy for PTP in general.
> 
> Should the commit message and the comment say that only L2 (ETH_P_1588)
> PTP is dropped? Or should the UDP case be handled as well?

The HSR/PRP specification mentions only L2 therefore the checks focus
here on L2. Using HSR and PTP with L3 transport such as UDPv4 is outside
the specification (or PTP profile). I don't think it makes sense to
mention this or check for this case.

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02 13:01 [PATCH net-next v8 0/8] hsr: Add additional info to send/ receive skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-02 13:01 ` [PATCH net-next v8 1/8] hsr: Add header_ops::parse_protocol Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-06 14:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 13:13     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-02 13:01 ` [PATCH net-next v8 2/8] hsr: Use skb_clone() while adding the HSR header Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-06 14:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 16:00     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-02 13:01 ` [PATCH net-next v8 3/8] hsr: Add a magic header for sending PTP packets Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-06 14:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 14:40     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-02 13:01 ` [PATCH net-next v8 4/8] hsr: Drop received " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-06 14:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 14:49     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2026-10-02 13:01 ` [PATCH net-next v8 5/8] hsr: Use the port and header information in hsr_forward_skb() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-06 14:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 15:03     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-02 13:01 ` [PATCH net-next v8 6/8] hsr: Assign a socket for cloned skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-06 14:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 15:33     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-02 13:01 ` [PATCH net-next v8 7/8] hsr: Move struct hsr_ethhdr to a global header Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-02 13:01 ` [PATCH net-next v8 8/8] selftests: hsr: Add test for the inline PTP header on HSR Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-06 14:31   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 15:56     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-10-05 12:16 ` [PATCH net-next v8 0/8] hsr: Add additional info to send/ receive skbs Daniel Machon
2026-10-12 12:52   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261012144903.EysNyyNj@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=c-vankar@ti.com \
    --cc=d-qiu@ti.com \
    --cc=danishanwar@ti.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmaurer@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=j-rameshbabu@ti.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=neelima@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=praneeth@ti.com \
    --cc=pratheesh@ti.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox