From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/3] ipv6: serialize address publication with device teardown
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:53:06 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261012145306.GB779501@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009054042.272944-2-4ncienth@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 02:40:40PM +0900, Daehyeon Ko wrote:
> ipv6_add_addr() checks idev state before allocating an ifaddr, but
> publishes the object later. addrconf_ifdown() can mark and detach the
> idev between the check and publication.
>
> This happens when a non-loopback device MTU falls below IPV6_MIN_MTU. A
> forced interleaving published an address on a dead idev, and later device
> deletion waited indefinitely for the leaked references.
>
> Protect the dead indication with idev->lock and keep that lock across
> both hash and device-list publication. Use READ_ONCE() for the initial
> lockless state checks, then recheck both dead and disable_ipv6 before
> publishing. If teardown wins, reject the unpublished object.
>
> Fixes: 8814c4b53381 ("[IPV6] ADDRCONF: Convert addrconf_lock to RCU.")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index c90ee6dd7446cd..77b3b1154d591c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -1095,13 +1095,13 @@ ipv6_add_addr(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct ifa6_config *cfg,
> return ERR_PTR(-EADDRNOTAVAIL);
> }
>
> - if (idev->dead) {
> + if (READ_ONCE(idev->dead)) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "device is going away");
> err = -ENODEV;
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (idev->cnf.disable_ipv6) {
> + if (READ_ONCE(idev->cnf.disable_ipv6)) {
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "IPv6 is disabled on this device");
> err = -EACCES;
> goto out;
This hunk is not needed for this fix.
> @@ -1168,14 +1168,20 @@ ipv6_add_addr(struct inet6_dev *idev, struct ifa6_config *cfg,
>
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> - err = ipv6_add_addr_hash(idev->dev, ifa);
> + write_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
> +
> + if (idev->dead)
> + err = -ENODEV;
> + else if (READ_ONCE(idev->cnf.disable_ipv6))
> + err = -EACCES;
I asked why this check is needed and you didn't respond:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261007164609.GB1153540@shredder/
And I provided a suggested diff on v1 that doesn't check 'disable_ipv6':
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261004135117.GA206930@shredder/
If you disagree with the suggestions, then say so instead of posting a
new version that ignores what was suggested.
> + else
> + err = ipv6_add_addr_hash(idev->dev, ifa);
> if (err < 0) {
> + write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> goto out;
> }
>
> - write_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
> -
> /* Add to inet6_dev unicast addr list. */
> ipv6_link_dev_addr(idev, ifa);
>
> @@ -3897,7 +3903,9 @@ static int addrconf_ifdown(struct net_device *dev, bool unregister)
> * Do not dev_put!
> */
> if (unregister) {
> + write_lock_bh(&idev->lock);
> WRITE_ONCE(idev->dead, 1);
> + write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
>
> /* protected by rtnl_lock */
> RCU_INIT_POINTER(dev->ip6_ptr, NULL);
> --
> 2.55.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 5:40 [PATCH net v3 0/3] ipv6: fix address publication races with addrconf_ifdown Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-09 5:40 ` [PATCH net v3 1/3] ipv6: serialize address publication with device teardown Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-10 5:43 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 15:13 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-10-12 14:53 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2026-10-09 5:40 ` [PATCH net v3 2/3] ipv6: remove ifaddr from hash during ifdown list cleanup Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-10 5:43 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-09 5:40 ` [PATCH net v3 3/3] ipv6: initialize temporary ifaddr before publication Daehyeon Ko
2026-10-10 5:43 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-12 14:52 ` Ido Schimmel
2026-10-09 5:44 ` [PATCH net v3 0/3] ipv6: fix address publication races with addrconf_ifdown netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261012145306.GB779501@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=4ncienth@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox