From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szelinsky.de (szelinsky.de [85.214.127.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70C123D34BB; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 09:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.127.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791883082; cv=none; b=EIs31/pzKcpmLImkZAj1xApm5pBu0OFGzaVZbi8K3V/ixRNTqyp1V0iXiCRmqCNBRQqJTBdzVOE6dCfa1h9NuSwHRfikte9BNacuLu8Kp7G251hKoIOujEhk9i7LIi8IcNj8MtPkQepLnorsQTk4CPFBc+Tn2e7qFP2MzIu2IRc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791883082; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fyiBIYufyxIi6uzpiUG2QI9MCRYC48F9PmNixrginhs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jq3Doqg3v9KQiMZAiH71U7IvJpGosT98wxC7z7Gcm4FB9JuzYxvGMf61qOHmS4XUnxkbeKw/RWgaGfUKemv/Grkl/wNHI2gDyS3qmaIWHpJWA7aPtPoyG6H1eCoOsqyD87vSSDEg7cjD6F8FTjt5TX2jK3KoMCla+p3l9cDQ0zs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=szelinsky.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=szelinsky.de; dkim=temperror (0-bit key) header.d=szelinsky.de header.i=@szelinsky.de header.b=CgKxtx9C; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.127.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=szelinsky.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=szelinsky.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=temperror (0-bit key) header.d=szelinsky.de header.i=@szelinsky.de header.b="CgKxtx9C" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szelinsky.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564CEE83923; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:09:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szelinsky.de; s=mail; t=1791882576; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9K0x8EVXp6dfLdQLW5fnQazXsB8eueO8FRPfzur9aNQ=; b=CgKxtx9Cjze85ZEaaZ/YL6WsPwa16tUT091w/hcONgdM4To10kuo3E3zOGAoht7eo6vNXa QzKIlEqM8N5q8cJFhbubjS8WFCsFKlS3KmL/sZvi7f71T9QzwX4F+mqEexK62b8oiVUEvk QM19wGVszk0GoMgXatYeE3fKlNBAVoucC+IV9sDc+0CzPjvNwRJ0GqLPja+8EFrWRQ7xGU y3hFvJDpT5JQlbdqPnL71yMTksgoC9dcQP9fIoLWq87BN6tnlQJK4IpHPEuw/j79EwmYWP 5aLTPxMCcXPwcfHm0iOCZ22x1xuBYCO67TPeuXu/zNslObvSU28eH7PcSsdIwA== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at szelinsky.de Received: from szelinsky.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (szelinsky.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10025) with ESMTP id Wh2ZjR5lJGPj; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:09:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from p14sgen5.lan (86-103-67-208.ip.tng.de [86.103.67.208]) by szelinsky.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:09:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Carlo Szelinsky To: Oleksij Rempel , Kory Maincent , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan Cc: Corey Leavitt , Jonas Jelonek , Simon Horman , Aleksander Jan Bajkowski , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org, sashiko-bot@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/7] net: pse-pd: decouple controller lookup from MDIO probe Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 11:09:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20261013090933.3552546-1-github@szelinsky.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 10/13/26 10:39, Kory Maincent wrote: > On 10/13/26 09:40, Paolo Abeni wrote: >> @Carlo: you should always reply to the AI review, even to point out >> previous discussion on the same point. And you should try to be more >> concise (even in the cover latter, should a repost be needed). > > Indeed, the cover letter should be more concise. It's hard to read like > that. Hi Köry, hi Paolo, Thanks for the feedback. I will reply to the AI review points and make the cover letter shorter. I am already working on v9, because some of the AI findings are real. So if you don't mind, you may want to wait for v9 before reviewing. Thanks, Carlo