From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Hidayath Khan <hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, dust.li@linux.alibaba.com,
sidraya@linux.ibm.com, mjambigi@linux.ibm.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net/smc: fix abort_work termination in smc_conn_free()
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 23:41:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261014214123.qNDtgrhJ@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006073550.1595003-1-hidayath@linux.ibm.com>
On 2026-10-06 09:35:50 [+0200], Hidayath Khan wrote:
> --- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
> +++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
> @@ -1251,9 +1251,13 @@ static void smc_buf_unuse(struct smc_connection *conn,
> }
> }
>
> -/* remove a finished connection from its link group */
> +/* remove a finished connection from its link group.
> + * Must be called with the socket lock held: conn->freed is what disarms
> + * a pending or running abort_work, and both are set and tested under it.
> + */
If so, sock_owned_by_me(conn->sk) would verify it at runtime, right?
> void smc_conn_free(struct smc_connection *conn)
> {
> + struct smc_sock *smc = container_of(conn, struct smc_sock, conn);
> struct smc_link_group *lgr = conn->lgr;
>
> if (!lgr || conn->freed)
This change looks reasonable. sashiko complains that smc_conn_create()
will reset conn->freed. Does this make sense to you?
I *think* the connection is cleaned up and it shouldn't happen but then
I just started looking at this a while ago.
Sebastian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 7:35 [PATCH net v3] net/smc: fix abort_work termination in smc_conn_free() Hidayath Khan
2026-10-06 7:39 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-08 19:38 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-14 21:41 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261014214123.qNDtgrhJ@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hidayath@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox