From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792441706; b=Ped76nh/gBlqc2Dca//6G/9+sjcb9XC61+EKPz9UeQjkwWi7D+nyAYNFbS45bYe9FM/Z MiF6q7Cc/ezzLafGIHAVOk1w5cOBhbMzb3fcS9fnzpMIQthIl9LuYFJjWme7qJNLoH8Kz kRjpwdmjs1xabKZkXBkx1shZUcTKrRrL2DX3/nN5tVbvYAehQYw70ztyVfmRCKcIO6UeL nnB/bVQVxA7z/7NWilHsWZGRyQSKBxLsylAJ+u3/MhJ3fAlg3nAag5fcg0a6w7X1sFSHv ygwQ+zpcUGApZFdHXzZtM/wkL/TqvAi5mTfTr6UkHnseqnt6xnZgX04iJFX3tvUhOlA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792441706; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=SwI4M7PzemP7Lrt2HFu5ElwpuokYBHAx6W3g1VLHeqI=; b=fWtiyBnO+AaMgil4Qc9CKDEI4gUU730uBwpuMAh8Qs3o9dETGPRiDCf4VF7Kw14/ZWfU WfA/NfqSj3OmkOwplYlDpb0No12NIY3ppQhBKKMRs4W0Nkd+/da+dezuqWQlUa1XugBwo orokvKCs0So9C7ZZFWDtYp5Kfg+pY+mgoREfLFURxq3euw9IL+sC/SffN0mnP2TfFp7BN IQHLsDj15idwV4b0U+PMpbeJ4ZW+UdulN4WQqKmFMSAnnakZoqvJNELzeDBRfsGDw2h8X Su3geBpmjDJ5Eod7o1o8WCUg3LAhXa5Queauyo/AQKLrhTEplvCbeDiol2x+UDLcQIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=LgDMf9rC; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA3DE606A31C for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 20:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=LgDMf9rC Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D73791F000C4; Mon, 19 Oct 2026 20:28:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792441705; bh=SwI4M7PzemP7Lrt2HFu5ElwpuokYBHAx6W3g1VLHeqI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=LgDMf9rCuuNoZKSAL//mS5IVPqaFZ9rlMmLRvzGN+9dtgfvC3qxHzYLASl8ChPi2b pa7bOElycaCCYGJawGYAjoUvLQ2LhNj7RS12fdSYcY5sjzQWWf385nwzs9k+IDCehA HSahndbqS+dFYobH4Msu8brU390qwYALaNs9NvX+ICCB1bj7QkDd6qcDjdxOtQ59cG PxhV05Q+mVVZPKaq0ekj3TLT+d2UT09DCuO0yCOUC/RgpLCn9vWpi5LMMwjJI2YQYp mSSSuhW1Td52x0ktpooQhTWihVM21vH32JklNDrsSPgX8QEp9ChkXossVesapguZZ3 pHjFV/S4OkwCQ== Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 13:28:24 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Zack McKevitt , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/drm_ras: Extend DRM RAS interface to include telemetry nodes Message-ID: <20261019132824.0f2b3350@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20261009173152.2436195-1-zachary.mckevitt@oss.qualcomm.com> <20261009173152.2436195-3-zachary.mckevitt@oss.qualcomm.com> <20261016180714.05fc93c5@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 08:12:28 -0400 Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 06:07:14PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2026 10:31:51 -0700 Zack McKevitt wrote: > > > + type: u64 > > > > prefer uint and then no pad > > same here, u64 aligns with hardware definition why uint should be desired? > I noticed the review prompts, I fail to agree because we need predictability > and align with hardware definitions. Just because u64 is defined to be aligned and require the padding. uint is a "modern u64"