Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamil Sawicki <user148783812897@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH net v2] net: limit priority VLAN untag depth
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 20:48:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261024004835.17862-1-user148783812897@gmail.com> (raw)

The priority VLAN receive path can repeatedly remove VID 0 tags and retry
packet processing. Unlike the read-only VLAN protocol parser, this path has
no limit on the number of nested tags it consumes.

Each skb_vlan_untag() advances skb->data and resets header offsets. The
offsets are stored in 16-bit fields. With enough nested tags, the network
or transport offset can wrap. A later protocol handler can then derive a
large pull length from the wrapped offsets and access memory outside the
skb allocation.

Apply the existing VLAN_MAX_DEPTH limit to the exceptional VID 0 retry.
Count the tag already stored in skb VLAN metadata as the first level, then
stop before untagging a ninth level. Keep the accounting inside this
uncommon branch so the regular VLAN receive path is unaffected.

A single VID 0 priority tag before a real VLAN tag is valid. No normal
deployment was found that intentionally emits multiple consecutive VID 0
tags; permitting eight levels is therefore conservative.

The issue was found while researching the Linux network receive path for
Google kvmCTF, with OpenAI Codex (gpt-5.6-sol) assisting the analysis. The
affected path, reproducer and fix were manually reviewed and tested.

Fixes: 36b2f61a42c2 ("net: handle 802.1P vlan 0 packets properly")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamil Sawicki <user148783812897@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- rename vlan_depth to priority_tag_depth
- report SKB_DROP_REASON_RECURSION_LIMIT when the limit is reached
- address the expected real-world tag depth in the commit message

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261023003750.1133904-1-user148783812897@gmail.com/

Runtime-tested on net/main f4377bf85887 (7.3-rc7) with KASAN. The
patched kernel blocked the nested vhost/TAP trigger on five fresh boots;
each run recorded eight skb_vlan_untag() calls, no tcp_v4_rcv() call and
no KASAN report. The eight-tag packet was delivered, the nine-tag packet
was dropped, and kfree_skb recorded SKB_DROP_REASON_RECURSION_LIMIT for
all three nine-tag test transmissions.

The fragmented-head test stopped after eight untag calls without reaching
IPv4 or TCP. A 100,044-byte nonlinear GSO skb crossed two VID 0 tags, and
a 32 MiB BIG TCP transfer completed with matching hashes and skb lengths
up to 130,376 bytes. The 31-sample protocol-253 control recorded no matching
skb_copy_and_csum_bits() call and no shadow-probe hit.

Rebased onto current net/main 734bef548a96 without changing the patch-id.
Strict checkpatch and W=1 net/core/dev.o builds using allyesconfig and
allmodconfig completed without warnings.

 net/core/dev.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 1a09e786911805..c9f07beee25782 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -6306,6 +6306,8 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb_core(struct sk_buff **pskb, bool pfmemalloc,
 	}
 
 	if (unlikely(skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)) && !netdev_uses_dsa(skb->dev)) {
+		unsigned int priority_tag_depth = 1;
+
 check_vlan_id:
 		if (skb_vlan_tag_get_id(skb)) {
 			/* Vlan id is non 0 and vlan_do_receive() above couldn't
@@ -6317,6 +6319,12 @@ static int __netif_receive_skb_core(struct sk_buff **pskb, bool pfmemalloc,
 			 * 802.1Q or 802.1AD and vlan_do_receive() above could
 			 * not find vlan dev for vlan id 0.
 			 */
+			if (unlikely(priority_tag_depth >= VLAN_MAX_DEPTH)) {
+				drop_reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_RECURSION_LIMIT;
+				goto drop;
+			}
+
+			priority_tag_depth++;
 			__vlan_hwaccel_clear_tag(skb);
 			skb = skb_vlan_untag(skb);
 			if (unlikely(!skb))

base-commit: 734bef548a96e8774d6eef5dfa2026c6edc4e80b
-- 
2.53.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-24  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-24  0:48 Kamil Sawicki [this message]
2026-10-24  8:22 ` [PATCH net v2] net: limit priority VLAN untag depth Eric Dumazet
2026-10-27  1:40 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-27  7:06   ` Eric Dumazet
2026-10-27 22:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261024004835.17862-1-user148783812897@gmail.com \
    --to=user148783812897@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox