From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Ding Hui <dinghui1111@163.com>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"open list:STMMAC ETHERNET DRIVER" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/STM32 ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dinghui@lixiang.com, xiasanbo@lixiang.com,
yangchen11@lixiang.com, liuxuanjun@lixiang.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: stmmac: fix DMA descriptor ring cleanup issues
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 08:40:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261029084040.24c85866@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fdea60e-abe8-4ecc-bce2-672f4e3d6b47@redhat.com>
On Thu, 29 Oct 2026 11:24:17 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> The merge window for Linux v7.4 has begun, and the net-next
> tree is now closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring
> and optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only.
But these are sort-of-fixes right? Aren't these okay to merge during
the merge window? AI bots will keep reporting the pre-existing issues
on net patches if we merge this to net-next. Dunno.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 7:13 [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: stmmac: fix DMA descriptor ring cleanup issues Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] net: stmmac: guard against NULL pointers when freeing TX/RX buffers Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: stmmac: clean up partially allocated DMA rings on error Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: stmmac: release descriptor resources through priv->dma_conf on open failure Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:13 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] net: stmmac: hold RTNL when reading descriptor rings in descriptors_status Ding Hui
2026-10-24 7:21 ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: stmmac: fix DMA descriptor ring cleanup issues netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-29 10:24 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-10-29 15:40 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261029084040.24c85866@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dinghui1111@163.com \
--cc=dinghui@lixiang.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=liuxuanjun@lixiang.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiasanbo@lixiang.com \
--cc=yangchen11@lixiang.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox