From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Cheng Yongkang <teel4res@gmail.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: bridge: disable MRP ports before the FDB flush in del_nbp()
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 16:25:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261030142552.GA53460@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179333317814.2102764.8780283783548366593@gmail.com>
Diff itself looks OK, but the commit message needs to be adjusted since
it no longer matches current net.git. See below. Please re-test on
current net.git and wait at least 24h before posting v3.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 09:06:18PM -0700, Cheng Yongkang wrote:
> net: bridge: disable MRP ports before the FDB flush in del_nbp()
>
> del_nbp() flushes the port's FDB entries before it unregisters the RX
> handler. For a normal port, br_stp_disable_port() has already moved the
> port to BR_STATE_DISABLED, so no frame is learned in between.
>
> That does not hold for an MRP ring port. br_set_state() ignores state
> changes while BR_MRP_AWARE_BIT is set, so br_stp_disable_port() leaves
> the port state alone, and br_mrp_port_del() then sets the port to
> BR_STATE_FORWARDING (when the bridge is up) before clearing the bit. A
> frame received between br_fdb_delete_by_port() and
s/br_fdb_delete_by_port/br_fdb_cleanup_by_dst/
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister() is learned with dst == p. Nothing
> removes that entry before destroy_nbp_rcu() frees the port, and a later
> frame to the learned MAC is forwarded to the freed port:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in br_forward+0x55/0x3c0
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880200bf038 by task mrp-poc/9420
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> br_forward+0x55/0x3c0
> br_handle_frame_finish+0x1300/0x1d40
> br_handle_frame+0x90a/0x15c0
>
> Remove the MRP and CFM instances before disabling the port, so that
> br_stp_disable_port() actually transitions the port to BR_STATE_DISABLED.
> The synchronize_net() in nbp_vlan_flush() then drains the receive paths
s/nbp_vlan_flush/nbp_vlan_group_unpublish/
> that could still learn with the old state, and the FDB flush that
> follows removes their entries. No frame can be learned after that
> flush and before netdev_rx_handler_unregister().
>
> Tested on v7.3 with KASAN and a reproducer that holds del_nbp() in the
> post-FDB-flush/pre-unregister window for 1.5 s while a flood keeps
> sending frames. The unpatched kernel reports the KASAN use-after-free
> above. With this change the same window is exercised in six cycles and
> no KASAN report is produced; normal bridge forwarding, FDB learning and
> port detach also pass.
>
> Fixes: 6536993371fa ("bridge: mrp: Integrate MRP into the bridge")
> Suggested-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261012123051.GA714215@shredder/
> Assisted-by: LLM
This tag is deprecated since commit 1e035297ffda ("docs: remove
Assisted-by references").
> Signed-off-by: Cheng Yongkang <teel4res@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_if.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> v2:
> - Implement the reorder suggested by Ido instead of adding a second FDB
> flush after netdev_rx_handler_unregister().
> - The reproducer still exercises the post-flush window; the unpatched
> kernel reports the KASAN use-after-free and the patched kernel does
> not.
> - Regression-tested normal bridge forwarding, FDB learning and port
> detach.
Please also include a link to v1.
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/179268538303.70821.8213834342995341232@gmail.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 4:06 [PATCH net v2] net: bridge: disable MRP ports before the FDB flush in del_nbp() Cheng Yongkang
2026-10-30 4:09 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-30 14:25 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261030142552.GA53460@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=teel4res@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox