From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Cc: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org, horatiu.vultur@microchip.com,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: lan966x: don't free XDP buffers in fdma tx clear with budget 0
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 11:41:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261102114135.GZ257209@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102085339.ixdqujaly75yldp7@DEN-DL-M70577.microsemi.net>
On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 09:53:39AM +0100, Daniel Machon wrote:
...
> > net: lan966x: don't free XDP buffers in fdma tx clear with budget 0
> >
> > This patch makes lan966x_fdma_tx_clear_buf() skip completed XDP_TX and
> > ndo_xdp_xmit DCBs when netpoll calls it with a budget of 0. That way the
> > page pool and XDP return APIs are not called with hardirqs disabled. The
> > skipped buffers are left for the next NAPI poll, and skbs are still freed
> > via napi_consume_skb().
> >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c
> > > index 21668bbcc9063..1fbe910c5ec38 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c
> > > @@ -353,6 +353,12 @@ static void lan966x_fdma_tx_clear_buf(struct lan966x *lan966x, int weight)
> > > if (!fdma_db_is_done(db))
> > > continue;
> > >
> > > + /* XDP and page pool APIs can't be used with a budget of 0.
> > > + * Leave these buffers for the next NAPI poll.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!weight && !dcb_buf->use_skb)
> > > + continue;
> >
> > [Severity: Medium]
> > Can this starve netconsole transmits on the port that owns the FDMA NAPI?
> >
> > skbs and XDP frames get slots from the same ring through
> > lan966x_fdma_get_next_dcb(), which only checks the used bit:
> >
> > lan966x_fdma_get_next_dcb() {
> > ...
> > if (!dcb_buf->used &&
> > !fdma_is_last(&tx->fdma, &tx->fdma.dcbs[i]))
> > return i;
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > If heavy XDP_TX or ndo_xdp_xmit traffic fills every usable slot, a
> > netpoll skb ends up here in lan966x_fdma_xmit():
> >
> > next_to_use = lan966x_fdma_get_next_dcb(tx);
> > if (next_to_use < 0) {
> > netif_stop_queue(dev);
> > return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> > }
> >
> > __netpoll_send_skb() then polls between retries:
> >
> > netpoll_poll_dev()->poll_one_napi()->napi->poll(napi, 0)
> > ->lan966x_fdma_tx_clear_buf(lan966x, 0)
> >
> > With the new check, every completed XDP DCB is skipped. No slot is freed,
> > clear stays false, and lan966x_fdma_wakeup_netdev() is never called.
> >
> > Once the retries run out, the skb is put on npinfo->txq and handed to
> > delayed work, and later messages queue behind it. In normal operation a
> > later IRQ-driven NAPI poll frees the DCBs and output only comes late.
> >
> > During a panic, with the other CPUs stopped and hardirqs off, would that
> > work ever run? If not, the netconsole output is lost.
> >
> > Before this patch, the budget-0 poll freed those slots, so netpoll could
> > make progress.
>
> Seems right, however, AFAICT, this is only an issue if the panic hits while the
> ring is completely full of finished XDP frames. Freeing those frames from
> netpoll is what napi.rst forbids: with a budget of 0 the driver cannot call any
> XDP or page pool APIs, and doing so is the splat this patch fixes.
>
> The only other way I see is to give XDP its own FDMA injection channel, so XDP
> frames can never take the slots netpoll needs. lan966x has free injection
> channels for that, but it is a rework for net-next, not a fix for net.
Yes, agreed.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 11:47 [PATCH net] net: lan966x: don't free XDP buffers in fdma tx clear with budget 0 Daniel Machon
2026-10-30 21:32 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-02 8:53 ` Daniel Machon
2026-11-02 11:41 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-11-02 12:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261102114135.GZ257209@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox