From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Dave Seddon <dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] libnetlink: zero padding in rta_addattr_l()
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 17:57:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261108175712.37b4c6f7@phoenix.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104052901.2735000-1-dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com>
On Tue, 3 Nov 2026 21:29:01 -0800
Dave Seddon <dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com> wrote:
> rta_addattr_l() copies alen bytes but advances the parent by
> RTA_ALIGN(len), so the 1-3 padding bytes are never written. Nests built
> in stack buffers (lwtunnel encap, RTA_MULTIPATH, RTA_METRICS) then send
> those bytes to the kernel. For example, in
>
> ip nexthop add id 53 encap mpls 101 ttl 10 via 192.0.2.1 dev d0
>
> the three bytes after MPLS_IPTUNNEL_TTL are stack contents:
>
> 05 00 02 00 0a 7f 00 00 MPLS_IPTUNNEL_TTL, ttl 10, stack bytes
> 05 00 02 00 0a 00 00 00 with this patch
>
> and valgrind reports "sendmsg(msg.msg_iov[0]) points to uninitialised
> byte(s)".
>
> The kernel skips padding when parsing, so nothing fails, but its own
> encoder zeroes it (__nla_reserve()). Do the same here.
>
> Fixes: 6ef87f9cce21 ("ip: route: add congestion control metric")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5
> Signed-off-by: Dave Seddon <dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com>
> ---
> addattr_l() has the same gap, but all its callers zero their request,
> so it is left alone.
>
> Kernel side: nla_next() advances by NLA_ALIGN(nla_len), so padding is
> never read; __nla_reserve() memsets it to zero.
> ---
Looks good but AI had some bike shedding on details.
Review summary: [PATCH iproute2] libnetlink: zero padding in rta_addattr_l()
Dave Seddon <dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com>, 2026-11-03
Patchwork-Id: 14942963 (delegate: dsahern@gmail.com)
VERDICT
Fix is correct. Two commit-message problems.
THE CHANGE
lib/libnetlink.c, 1 insertion:
+ memset((void *)subrta + len, 0, RTA_ALIGN(len) - len);
rta_addattr_l() copies alen bytes but advances the parent by
RTA_ALIGN(len), so 1-3 padding bytes were never written. Nests built
in stack buffers sent stack contents to the kernel.
VERIFIED
- Bounds safe: existing check reserves RTA_ALIGN(rta->rta_len) +
RTA_ALIGN(len), so the memset cannot pass maxlen. Exact-fit case
(maxlen=8, alen=1) returns -1 before reaching the memset.
- alen == 0 (rta_nest path): len = RTA_LENGTH(0) = 4, already
aligned, memset is a no-op, does not scribble past the header.
- Byte pattern matches changelog exactly:
before: 05 00 02 00 0a 7f 00 00
after: 05 00 02 00 0a 00 00 00
- Coverage complete: rta_addattr8/16/64 all route through
rta_addattr_l(). rta_addattr32() needs nothing (len=8, aligned).
- Applies to oss-nlseq tip (offset -7 lines), builds clean.
Test apply reverted; working tree untouched.
PROBLEM 1 - note below the --- is wrong
Claims "addattr_l() has the same gap". It does not. addattr_l() has
zeroed its padding since 07f9436201eb (2005, "Use NLMSG_TAIL and add
addraw_l") -- same memset, same file. That is the precedent this
patch follows, worth citing rather than disclaiming.
PROBLEM 2 - Fixes tag is misdirected
Fixes: 6ef87f9cce21 ("ip: route: add congestion control metric")
is a real unaligned caller (RTAX_CC_ALGO string) but not the cause.
The defect is in rta_addattr_l() itself, back to the BitKeeper
import (aba5acdf, 2004) -- no useful commit to tag. The MPLS TTL
reproducer in the changelog is from 9688cf3b, different again.
Recommend: drop the tag, state in the body that this affects every
caller passing an unaligned length.
SEVERITY
Hygiene, not a vulnerability. Kernel nla_next() advances by
NLA_ALIGN(nla_len) so padding is never parsed; the 1-3 bytes go to
the kernel, not onto the wire. Real motivations are the valgrind
report and matching the kernel's own __nla_reserve(). The changelog
already frames this accurately.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 5:29 [PATCH iproute2] libnetlink: zero padding in rta_addattr_l() Dave Seddon
2026-11-09 1:57 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261108175712.37b4c6f7@phoenix.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dave.seddon.ca@gmail.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox