Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	jv@jvosburgh.net, haiyangz@microsoft.com, ast@kernel.org,
	hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: don't safety-check device features for XDP uninstall
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 16:07:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261113160735.4502de4b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179461399476.2199510.18058765948144630080@kernel.org>

On Fri, 13 Nov 2026 23:53:14 +0000 netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Is this really only a cleanup? It looks like it also fixes an XDP
> uninstall failure that can be hit in the current tree.

TBH it's been a while since I wrote this commit so I could be
misremembering, but IIRC what I mean to say in the commit msg is that 
I wrote the patch because the shape of the code was annoying me. 
There _may_ be some cases where we already got into bad state which
this fixes. But fixing any specific case wasn't what made me write 
the patch. (And the whole XDP prog state got desynced area has too
many bugs to claim this moves the needle).

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-14  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-12 23:50 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: make xdp config checks effective vs netif_xdp_propagate() Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-12 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: don't safety-check device features for XDP uninstall Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-13 23:53   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-14  0:07     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-11-12 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: move dev_xdp_set_link() and dev_xdp_set_prog() up Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-12 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: record XDP programs propagated to lower devices Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-13 23:53   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-14  0:16     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-12 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: check XDP attach on a nested bond slave Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-12 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: check replacing and detaching XDP on a bond through a link Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-13 23:53   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-13 22:22 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: make xdp config checks effective vs netif_xdp_propagate() Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261113160735.4502de4b@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox