From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 3/6] net: guard memory provider RX queue open and close on unregister
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 02:26:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261115022607.348112-4-almasrymina@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261115022607.348112-1-almasrymina@google.com>
When an RX queue is leased from a physical backing net_device to a
virtual net_device (e.g., netkit), memory provider operations reach the
physical net_device through rxq->lease and lock it directly via
netdev_lock(dev) rather than looking it up via
netdev_get_by_index_lock().
Introduce a netif_lease_valid() helper checking netif_is_alive(dev)
under netdev_lock(dev) and use it in the lease-aware callers while
keeping __netif_mp_open_rxq() and __netif_mp_close_rxq() unaware of
queue leasing:
1. In netif_mp_open_rxq(), if the leased physical device is already
unregistering (!netif_lease_valid(dev)), netdev_get_by_index_lock()
on the virtual netdev succeeds before cascaded unregistration runs,
allowing a new memory provider to be installed on the physical device
while it is unregistering. Reject the open with -ENODEV.
2. In netif_mp_close_rxq() and netif_rxq_cleanup_unlease(),
__netif_mp_close_rxq() reconfigures the physical RX queue so that it
can continue operating with a regular page_pool when the physical
netdev outlives the virtual queue or memory provider. When the
physical backing netdev is itself unregistering
(!netif_lease_valid(dev)), its queue will not outlive the lease and,
matching the non-leased unregistration path (where
dev_memory_provider_uninstall() detaches the provider without calling
netdev_rx_queue_reconfig()), the physical queue should not be
reconfigured. However, unlike non-leased queues,
mp_dmabuf_devmem_uninstall() on the physical netdev does not match
bound_rxqs (which stores the virtual rxq), leaving
phys_rxq->mp_params populated until socket teardown or the virtual
leasee's netif_rxq_cleanup_unlease() runs. When
!netif_lease_valid(dev), skip __netif_mp_close_rxq() and clear
mp_params on the physical queue directly so that a subsequent
netif_rxq_cleanup_unlease() or dev_memory_provider_uninstall() sees
!mp_ops and does not uninstall a second time.
Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
---
net/core/dev.h | 7 +++++++
net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.h b/net/core/dev.h
index 4e9e8cd156977..50cfede051db1 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.h
+++ b/net/core/dev.h
@@ -119,6 +119,13 @@ bool netif_rxq_has_mp(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int rxq_idx);
bool netif_rxq_is_leased(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int rxq_idx);
bool netif_is_queue_leasee(const struct net_device *dev);
+static inline bool netif_lease_valid(const struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ netdev_assert_locked(dev);
+
+ return netif_is_alive(dev);
+}
+
void __netif_mp_uninstall_rxq(struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq,
const struct pp_memory_provider_params *p);
diff --git a/net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c b/net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c
index a7261fedd5e76..98b51b2ac8ee1 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev_rx_queue.c
@@ -270,7 +270,12 @@ int netif_mp_open_rxq(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int rxq_idx,
}
netdev_lock(dev);
- ret = __netif_mp_open_rxq(dev, rxq_idx, p, extack);
+ if (netif_lease_valid(dev)) {
+ ret = __netif_mp_open_rxq(dev, rxq_idx, p, extack);
+ } else {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Device is being unregistered");
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ }
netdev_unlock(dev);
return ret;
}
@@ -309,19 +314,29 @@ static int __netif_mp_close_rxq(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int rxq_idx,
int netif_mp_close_rxq(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int rxq_idx,
const struct pp_memory_provider_params *old_p)
{
- int ret;
+ struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq;
+ int ret = 0;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rxq_idx >= dev->real_num_rx_queues))
return -EINVAL;
if (!netif_rxq_is_leased(dev, rxq_idx))
return __netif_mp_close_rxq(dev, rxq_idx, old_p);
- if (!__netif_get_rx_queue_lease(&dev, &rxq_idx, NETIF_VIRT_TO_PHYS)) {
+ rxq = __netif_get_rx_queue_lease(&dev, &rxq_idx, NETIF_VIRT_TO_PHYS);
+ if (!rxq) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
return -EINVAL;
}
netdev_lock(dev);
- ret = __netif_mp_close_rxq(dev, rxq_idx, old_p);
+ /* If the physical netdev is already unregistering, the queue will not
+ * outlive the lease; only clear mp_params so subsequent
+ * netif_rxq_cleanup_unlease() or dev_memory_provider_uninstall() is a
+ * no-op.
+ */
+ if (netif_lease_valid(dev))
+ ret = __netif_mp_close_rxq(dev, rxq_idx, old_p);
+ else
+ memset(&rxq->mp_params, 0, sizeof(rxq->mp_params));
netdev_unlock(dev);
return ret;
}
@@ -340,6 +355,9 @@ void __netif_mp_uninstall_rxq(struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq,
* the lease redirection. The extra __netif_mp_close_rxq is needed
* since the physical queue can outlive the virtual queue in the lease
* case, so it needs to be reconfigured to clear the memory provider.
+ * If the physical netdev is also unregistering, its queue will not
+ * outlive the lease, so only clear mp_params without reconfiguring the
+ * queue.
*/
void netif_rxq_cleanup_unlease(struct netdev_rx_queue *phys_rxq,
struct netdev_rx_queue *virt_rxq)
@@ -350,6 +368,9 @@ void netif_rxq_cleanup_unlease(struct netdev_rx_queue *phys_rxq,
if (!p.mp_ops)
return;
- __netif_mp_close_rxq(phys_rxq->dev, rxq_idx, &p);
+ if (netif_lease_valid(phys_rxq->dev))
+ __netif_mp_close_rxq(phys_rxq->dev, rxq_idx, &p);
+ else
+ memset(&phys_rxq->mp_params, 0, sizeof(phys_rxq->mp_params));
__netif_mp_uninstall_rxq(virt_rxq, &p);
}
--
2.56.0.611.g1030f0b940-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-15 2:26 [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] net: devmem: support leased RX and TX queues on netdev unregister Mina Almasry
2026-11-15 2:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net: devmem: pass net_device pointer to net_devmem_lock_dev() Mina Almasry
2026-11-15 2:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] net: devmem: rename binding dev and vdev to map_dev and bind_dev Mina Almasry
2026-11-15 2:26 ` Mina Almasry [this message]
2026-11-15 2:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/6] net: devmem: always populate bind_dev and detach both devices on unregister Mina Almasry
2026-11-15 2:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] net: devmem: resolve physical map_dev for leased RX bindings Mina Almasry
2026-11-15 2:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/6] selftests: net: add leased devmem RX and TX netdev unregister tests Mina Almasry
2026-11-15 20:08 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] net: devmem: support leased RX and TX queues on netdev unregister netdev-bot+sinfo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261115022607.348112-4-almasrymina@google.com \
--to=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox