From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless 2012-06-22
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:40:31 +0530
Message-ID: <20453.24023.191664.676844@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
References: <20120622201716.GB13918@tuxdriver.com>
	<20452.64701.760819.559191@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<20453.302.671438.533390@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<20120622.165611.2220193371527786713.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20453.9687.225096.194368@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
	<20120623041103.GA29801@tuxdriver.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120623041103.GA29801@tuxdriver.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

John W. Linville wrote:
> > The patch was under review:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=134001371002288&w=2
> 
> Quibbling over the exact number of iterations for a timeout didn't
> seem is important as avoiding an endless loop...

Yes, which is why I okayed the patch. :)

Sujith