From: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org,
Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/15] batman-adv: tt: extract marking of a removed local entry
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 19:26:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2056796.PYKUYFuaPT@sven-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907081824.2474040-11-sw@simonwunderlich.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2271 bytes --]
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260907081824.2474040-1-sw%40simonwunderlich.de?part=10
[...]
> Discovered by: opus-5, old-prompts · Missed by: gpt-5-6-sol, sashiko-gemini
>
> Two comments in batadv_tt_local_remove() look like they no longer match the
> code after the move.
>
> First, the untouched comment further down in batadv_tt_local_remove() still
> refers to a check "above":
>
> net/batman-adv/translation-table.c:batadv_tt_local_remove() {
> ...
> /* batadv_tt_local_transition_new() may have committed the entry and
> * thus counted it in the local table size since the BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW
> * check above.
> */
> if (!(batadv_tt_flags_get(&tt_local_entry->common) & BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW))
> batadv_tt_local_size_dec(bat_priv, tt_local_entry->common.vid);
> ...
> }
>
> After this patch there is no BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW test left anywhere above
> that point in this function; the only one is now inside the new helper:
>
> net/batman-adv/translation-table.c:batadv_tt_local_mark_removed() {
> ...
> if (!(common->flags & BATADV_TT_CLIENT_NEW)) {
> common->flags |= BATADV_TT_CLIENT_PENDING;
> pending = true;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> Should the wording be updated in this patch to name the helper, so the
> size-accounting race stays traceable from the function it is documented in?
See patch 11 "batman-adv: tt: extract immediate purge of a local entry"
> Second, the retained comment above the "if (roaming)" line still says the
> node "has to mark the local entry as roamed", but the code it now precedes
> only assembles the announcement flag word; the actual
> common->flags |= BATADV_TT_CLIENT_ROAM happens in the
> batadv_tt_local_mark_removed() call two lines below. Would it read better
> moved or reworded so it describes the flag assembly?
>
> No functional change is apparent here: flags is fully computed before the
> call, *curr_flags is written unconditionally inside the guard so curr_flags
> is always initialized for the caller, and the helper is only reached after
> the !tt_local_entry early goto.
See https://patchwork.open-mesh.org/project/b.a.t.m.a.n./patch/20260908-sashiko-kdoc-v1-2-535b498f2519@narfation.org/
Regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 8:18 [PATCH net-next 00/15] pull request for net-next: batman-adv 2026-09-07 Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] batman-adv: tt: look up wifi state of incoming interface in helper Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-11 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] batman-adv: tt: extract allocation of new local entries Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] batman-adv: tt: replace forward gotos in batadv_tt_local_add() Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] batman-adv: tt: extract refresh of existing local entries Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] batman-adv: tt: extract update of dynamic client flags Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] batman-adv: tt: extract allocation of new global entries Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] batman-adv: tt: extract merging of flags into existing " Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] batman-adv: tt: replace add_orig_entry goto in batadv_tt_global_add() Simon Wunderlich
[not found] ` <20260908082701.B6CCD1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>
2026-09-08 9:22 ` Sven Eckelmann
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] batman-adv: tt: extract removal of the superseded local entry Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-08 17:26 ` Sven Eckelmann
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] batman-adv: tt: extract marking of a removed " Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-08 17:26 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] batman-adv: tt: extract immediate purge of a " Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-08 17:26 ` Sven Eckelmann
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] batman-adv: tt: drop the cleanup label from batadv_tt_local_remove() Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] batman-adv: tt: clarify kernel doc for batadv_tt_local_set_pending_event() Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] batman-adv: bat_iv: fix ogm_neigh_is_sob parameters references Simon Wunderlich
2026-09-07 8:18 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] batman-adv: correct batadv_hash_remove kdoc return type Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2056796.PYKUYFuaPT@sven-desktop \
--to=sven@narfation.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox