From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Mueller Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] esp6: Switch to new AEAD interface Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 09:16:08 +0200 Message-ID: <2066513.Bca9qAkvxD@tauon> References: <20150521103938.GA23035@gondor.apana.org.au> <2287044.Rx7bts6Hbt@tauon> <20150522064554.GA2522@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Johannes Berg , Marcel Holtmann , Steffen Klassert To: Herbert Xu Return-path: Received: from mail.eperm.de ([89.247.134.16]:58177 "EHLO mail.eperm.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756443AbbEVHQL (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2015 03:16:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150522064554.GA2522@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Freitag, 22. Mai 2015, 14:45:54 schrieb Herbert Xu: Hi Herbert, >On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:40:25AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: >> If I may ask, where in your initial patch set is now decided that the IV >> generator is used (i.e. so that the givcrypt API is not needed any more)? > >Please see > >https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org/msg14270.html Thanks for the pointer, but there I do not really see the functionality I am looking for. I see patch 10/16 which seems to indicate that the geniv logic is now to be invoked as a normal AEAD cipher. I yet fail to see where the distinction is made in the code that an IV is to be generated versus the given IV is to be used. Ciao Stephan