From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vulcan.natalenko.name ([104.207.131.136]:17312 "EHLO vulcan.natalenko.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716AbeBUGOw (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 01:14:52 -0500 From: Oleksandr Natalenko To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Eric Dumazet , "David S . Miller" , netdev , Neal Cardwell , Yuchung Cheng , Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] tcp: remove non GSO code Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:14:49 +0100 Message-ID: <2077050.JV33r27xBe@natalenko.name> In-Reply-To: <1519168897.55655.31.camel@gmail.com> References: <20180219195652.242663-1-edumazet@google.com> <2638137.lzCXOlOYsz@natalenko.name> <1519168897.55655.31.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi. On st=C5=99eda 21. =C3=BAnora 2018 0:21:37 CET Eric Dumazet wrote: > My latest patch (fixing BBR underestimation of cwnd) > was meant for net tree, on a NIC where SG/TSO/GSO) are disabled. >=20 > ( ie when sk->sk_gso_max_segs is not set to 'infinite' ) >=20 > It is packet scheduler independent really. >=20 > Tested here with pfifo_fast, TSO/GSO off. Well, before the patch with BBR and sg off here it is ~450 Mbps for fq and= =20 ~115 Mbps for pfifo_fast. So, comparing to what I see with the patch (850 a= nd=20 200 respectively), it is definitely an improvement. Thanks.