Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@codeconstruct.com.au>
To: Kenny Hsieh <kenny_hsieh@jabil.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Matt Johnston	 <matt@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
	Peter Rosin	 <peda@lysator.liu.se>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	davem@davemloft.net, Eric Dumazet	 <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni	 <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mctp i2c: add sysfs control for mux child netdevs
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:02:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20853c96b17ea29815ccc34fcc6556032df8291d.camel@codeconstruct.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002073156.759005-1-kenny_hsieh@jabil.com>

Hi Kenny,

> An MCTP netdev is created for an I2C bus that carries an
> "mctp-controller" property in the devicetree. A bus instantiated at
> runtime through the I2C sysfs interface has no devicetree node on which
> to set that property, so it can never get a netdev.
> 
> This matters for a mux topology that is only known at runtime. A BMC
> that ships one firmware image across several chassis cannot describe
> every chassis's mux tree in its devicetree. Userspace creates the muxes
> it finds over i2c sysfs instead, and the channels below them have no
> node of their own.
> 
> Add a writable "mctp_controller" attribute on mux child adapters below
> a bus that has an mctp-i2c-controller device bound to it. A mux tree
> with no such device is untouched. Writing 1 creates the netdev for that
> bus, writing 0 removes it, and reading reports whether one exists.
> Userspace can then enable MCTP per channel once it has created the
> muxes.

More a request than a review: since you're going to the trouble of
allowing dynamic MCTP devices on mux subordinates, would it be possible
to also allow this for the root controllers as well?

The use-case I have is dynamic I2C devices - say USB-attached - that do
not have any facility for DT configuration. The proposed sysfs property
could allow runtime configuration for those too.

Cheers,


Jeremy

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02  7:31 [PATCH net-next] mctp i2c: add sysfs control for mux child netdevs Kenny Hsieh
2026-10-06  8:01 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-07  7:22   ` Kenny Hsieh
2026-10-06 10:31 ` Matt Johnston
2026-10-07  6:06   ` Kenny Hsieh
2026-10-13  7:02 ` Jeremy Kerr [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20853c96b17ea29815ccc34fcc6556032df8291d.camel@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --to=jk@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=kenny_hsieh@jabil.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peda@lysator.liu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox