From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.13 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792495108; b=q5rzbM62ubmvCoAz1bfcu66xZoAa5IPQzLoL323Mezztm7Oa5/Wkh87hgeCV1j41Xouw IGy34VCihq9GXjaVaTNXK4baYYglqIHD3Pkvw0a7jV8xosSVxOzh4soXZiLlzaLeNJtY6 DZEKm+Ey5Mn+C3Xb6y1ltyAdsVgAsXFUhfOvAMpgadxEDXiwk7MMRMW2SAq0N8CkEcPRV 8xp+ajs/VZop/aQZJaL0nsU8v4+ShKHeFUl2Tncv2h9za3Hh5qADCsCNgziGrOdsGc6a9 A5GTxbHtsPuTSHEqBkDjlyj87gCOpNpcChjMGMTVd5rp3QD/+Z5QTomtcxPDCFiNWWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792495108; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:User-Agent: Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=R5IQJPZPaZ722ekjdLCDgWz4ITlLwSuM6xAfRDg9ni0=; b=AJQB2rdkJ7QW9y9YTGVotW+2quma0v+N81NswQXsoeTC/Cp1h0DbfMxhXywtp6DVW2Ob 7gKddZ3LEAZ0ufdbYUwAxhwtdeo6kiA871bMsS50iDe9nuL/lbsq+Glm2enD0kIMugaki otlckaRcFgEnQvRpyMC5si2oIUp0ey5to04G5TrxwZPrWjI7evkZAQlbyMDD4bETLJEZy gkf2h4dLUldOc1gjKNW5i8nBu6wQgfKlwi+qY7W3clTl2LPkkS/nx0wVKbOMu52uR1X41 94+ZyxtU/1dVz9tkjqtmgyQqD0UwAxvLkFo/Ew4KCxuRKrHRc2ntcGkQ8L+/3K8u0NA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=dk4k5rJ2; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.218.175.13 Received: from mta0.migadu.com (out-13.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.13]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F414606A31A for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 11:18:20 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 5F414606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=dk4k5rJ2 X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=R5IQJPZPaZ722ekjdLCDgWz4ITlLwSuM6xAfRDg9ni0=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1792495099; v=1; x=1793099899; b=dk4k5rJ2uBJQaK0Ebxj+ZRKGeR7+0Dzboqmb1PAWhUgNDcQrvmS/Q6DIv+x0/jUNhCjPP81I hvVMRm2bPmIP9yN8+OhNAY907Bgu2YUyLLpGSbukh7MLi0HivgX9e9PTJ2XIn9ooDJwHKZLE6V/ OOJPryfOPQ5r4u51Xx+w3T60= X-Envelope-To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id 380707f91af7ed82; Tue, 20 Oct 2026 11:18:19 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: 380707f91af7ed82 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Message-ID: <21053bda-1be0-45c3-80a1-fe012886ab0f@linux.dev> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 19:18:09 +0800 X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tls: check the right open record in TLS_TX_MAX_PAYLOAD_LEN To: Sabrina Dubroca , Rishikesh Jethwani Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20261019222626.745408-1-rjethwani@purestorage.com> From: Jiayuan Chen In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Sabrina, Thanks for your reminder. I totally forgot that thread. I will send a v3 and update the commit message to address Paolo's comment. On 10/20/26 6:58 PM, Sabrina Dubroca wrote: > 2026-10-19, 16:26:25 -0600, Rishikesh Jethwani wrote: >> do_tls_setsockopt_tx_payload_len() refuses to change the record size >> limit while a record is open, because both TX paths size the record they >> are filling against tx_max_payload_len. It looks for the open record >> through tls_sw_ctx_tx(), a plain cast of priv_ctx_tx to >> struct tls_sw_context_tx. I guess sashiko will complain the same issue: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260901031931.1636980-1-kuba@kernel.org/ > There was already a patch for this > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260901072927.128688-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/ > with extra locking to address sashiko comments. > > Jiayuan, were you going to send a v3 to address Paolo's comment? Or > maybe resend your v2, since it got marked as "changes requested" in > patchwork?