public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@nabladev.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Ronald Wahl <ronald.wahl@raritan.com>,
	Yicong Hui <yiconghui@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net,PATCH] net: ks8851: Reinstate disabling of BHs around IRQ handler
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 21:15:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <215ad1cc5db3f352ac2a130c07dbd830@tipi-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9845b8e-5d3f-472b-8f03-bba699ba3882@nabladev.com>

On 8.4.2026 17:41, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 4/8/26 12:54 PM, Nicolai Buchwitz wrote:
> 
> Hello Nicolai,
> 
> thank you for testing on the SPI variant, that helped a lot.
> 
>> In order to make this work I would propose something like this (which 
>> works in my SPI setup):
>> 
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_par.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_par.c
>> @@ -60,12 +60,14 @@ static void ks8851_lock_par(struct ks8851_net *ks, 
>> unsigned long *flags)
>>   {
>>       struct ks8851_net_par *ksp = to_ks8851_par(ks);
>> 
>> +    local_bh_disable();
>>       spin_lock_irqsave(&ksp->lock, *flags);
>>   }
>> 
>>   static void ks8851_unlock_par(struct ks8851_net *ks, unsigned long 
>> *flags)
>>   {
>>       struct ks8851_net_par *ksp = to_ks8851_par(ks);
>> 
>>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ksp->lock, *flags);
>> +    local_bh_enable();
>>   }
>> 
>> Tested-by: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>  # KS8851 SPI, non-RT 
>> (regression + proposed fix)
> 
> Are you also able to test the KS8851 driver with PREEMPT_RT enabled and 
> heavy iperf3 traffic on the SPI variant ? Does that trigger any issues 
> ? I ran 'iperf3 -s' on the KS8851 end and 'iperf3 -c 192.168.1.300 -t 0 
> --bidir' on the host PC side.

Successfully tested with both PREEMPT_RT and non-RT kernels using the 
iperf3 command above - no issues observed. Both builds included the fix 
from my previous message.
If there is anything else worth testing on the KS8851 SPI variant, 
please let me know.

> 
> Let me prepare a slightly updated fix and send a V2.

Regards
Nicolai

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-08 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-07 21:23 [net,PATCH] net: ks8851: Reinstate disabling of BHs around IRQ handler Marek Vasut
2026-04-08  7:51 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-08 10:54 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-04-08 15:41   ` Marek Vasut
2026-04-08 19:15     ` Nicolai Buchwitz [this message]
2026-04-08 21:21       ` Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=215ad1cc5db3f352ac2a130c07dbd830@tipi-net.de \
    --to=nb@tipi-net.de \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@nabladev.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=ronald.wahl@raritan.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yiconghui@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox