From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>, Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tipc: block BH before using dst_cache
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 08:57:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <217375c0-d49d-63b1-0628-9aaf7e4e42d0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76d02a44-91dd-ded6-c3dc-f86685ae1436@redhat.com>
On 5/22/20 8:01 AM, Jon Maloy wrote:
>
>
> On 5/22/20 2:18 AM, Xin Long wrote:
>> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:55 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>>> Resend to the list in non HTML form
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:53 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:50 PM Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 2:30 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>> dst_cache_get() documents it must be used with BH disabled.
>>>>> Interesting, I thought under rcu_read_lock() is enough, which calls
>>>>> preempt_disable().
>>>>
>>>> rcu_read_lock() does not disable BH, never.
>>>>
>>>> And rcu_read_lock() does not necessarily disable preemption.
>> Then I need to think again if it's really worth using dst_cache here.
>>
>> Also add tipc-discussion and Jon to CC list.
> The suggested solution will affect all bearers, not only UDP, so it is not a good.
> Is there anything preventing us from disabling preemtion inside the scope of the rcu lock?
>
> ///jon
>
BH is disabled any way few nano seconds later, disabling it a bit earlier wont make any difference.
Also, if you intend to make dst_cache BH reentrant, you will have to make that for net-next, not net tree.
Please carefully read include/net/dst_cache.h
It is very clear about BH requirements.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-22 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-21 18:29 [PATCH net] tipc: block BH before using dst_cache Eric Dumazet
2020-05-22 5:56 ` Xin Long
[not found] ` <CANn89i+x=xbXoKekC6bF_ZMBRMY_mkmuVbNSW3LcRncsiZGd_g@mail.gmail.com>
2020-05-22 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-05-22 6:18 ` Xin Long
2020-05-22 15:01 ` Jon Maloy
2020-05-22 15:57 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2020-05-22 19:47 ` Jon Maloy
2020-05-22 20:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-05-22 21:37 ` Jon Maloy
2020-05-22 21:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-05-23 0:28 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-05-22 15:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-05-22 22:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=217375c0-d49d-63b1-0628-9aaf7e4e42d0@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).