From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [RFC 04/15] irqchip: st: Add missing MFD_SYSCON dependency on HAS_IOMEM Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:28:29 +0100 Message-ID: <2188157.YL7RR6FeEK@wuerfel> References: <1456992221-26712-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <2506651.J2Z42d81nD@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brown , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Belloni , Laurent Pinchart , Lee Jones , Thomas Gleixner , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul , Daniel Lezcano , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Andy Gross , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Jason Cooper , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Giuseppe Cavallaro , Dan Williams In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thursday 03 March 2016 21:00:57 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > Not user visible. > > Hmmm... you are right (here and in other patches) but why am I getting > all these errors: > warning: (ST_IRQCHIP && HIP04_ETH && STMMAC_PLATFORM && DWMAC_IPQ806X > && DWMAC_LPC18XX && DWMAC_ROCKCHIP && DWMAC_SOCFPGA && DWMAC_STI && > TI_CPSW && PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP && PINCTRL_DOVE && POWER_RESET_KEYSTONE && > S3C2410_WATCHDOG && VIDEO_OMAP3 && VIDEO_S5P_FIMC && USB_XHCI_MTK && > RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9 && LPC18XX_DMAMUX && VIDEO_OMAP4 && HWSPINLOCK_QCOM > && ATMEL_ST && QCOM_GSBI && PHY_HI6220_USB) selects MFD_SYSCON which > has unmet direct dependencies (HAS_IOMEM) > ? > (ARCH=um, allyesconfig) The problem is that Kconfig will just print any option that selects the one that has a missing dependency, but doesn't show which of those are actually enabled. > Adding depends here (and in other places) really helps... but it > should not have any impact... I think patch 5 by itself would have been sufficient. Arnd