From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>, Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: bond_select_queue off by one
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 20:41:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22094.1298004108@death> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110218020713.GA9696@linuxace.com>
Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com> wrote:
>The bonding driver's bond_select_queue function simply returns
>skb->queue_mapping. However queue_mapping could be == 16
>for queue #16. This causes the following message to be flooded
>to syslog:
>
>kernel: bondx selects TX queue 16, but real number of TX queues is 16
>
>ndo_select_queue wants a zero-based number, so bonding driver needs
>to subtract one to return the proper queue number. Also fix grammar in
>a comment while in the vicinity.
Andy, can you comment on this?
If memory serves, the omission of queue ID zero was on purpose;
is this patch going to break any of the functionality added by:
commit bb1d912323d5dd50e1079e389f4e964be14f0ae3
Author: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Date: Wed Jun 2 08:40:18 2010 +0000
bonding: allow user-controlled output slave selection
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:
>This looks basically correct, but it should use the proper functions:
>
> skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb) ? skb_get_rx_queue(skb) : 0;
As Ben points out, skb_rx_queue_recorded, skb_record_rx_queue,
et al, do the offset by one internally, but the bond_slave_override
function is comparing the slave's queue_id to the skb->queue_mapping.
That makes me wonder if this patch is going to mess things up,
and if bond_slave_override should also use the skb_rx_queue_recorded, et
al, functions.
-J
>Phil Oester
>
>Signed-off-by: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
>
>
>--- linux-2.6/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c.orig 2011-01-30 09:15:09.813843817 -0800
>+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 2011-02-17 18:02:46.919050909 -0800
>@@ -4537,11 +4537,11 @@
> {
> /*
> * This helper function exists to help dev_pick_tx get the correct
>- * destination queue. Using a helper function skips the a call to
>+ * destination queue. Using a helper function skips a call to
> * skb_tx_hash and will put the skbs in the queue we expect on their
> * way down to the bonding driver.
> */
>- return skb->queue_mapping;
>+ return skb->queue_mapping ? skb->queue_mapping - 1 : 0;
> }
>
> static netdev_tx_t bond_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-18 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-18 2:07 [PATCH] bonding: bond_select_queue off by one Phil Oester
2011-02-18 3:46 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-18 4:41 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2011-02-18 22:49 ` Andy Gospodarek
2011-02-18 23:06 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-02-21 18:06 ` Andy Gospodarek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22094.1298004108@death \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=kernel@linuxace.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).