From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next-2.6 3/4] bond: implement slave management operations
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:19:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22104.1297444790@death> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110211152257.GC2763@psychotron.brq.redhat.com>
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com> wrote:
>Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 1df9f0e..f8e59f9 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
I think this would be better served by a new bond_netlink.c
file instead of cramming this into (the already huge) bond_main.c. In
the long run, there will be a lot more netlink related code in bonding,
so I think it makes sense to give it a file of its own from the
beginning.
>@@ -4285,6 +4285,40 @@ unwind:
> return res;
> }
>
>+static int bond_add_slave(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>+ struct net_device *slave_dev)
>+{
>+ return bond_enslave(bond_dev, slave_dev);
>+}
>+
>+static int bond_del_slave(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>+ struct net_device *slave_dev)
>+{
>+ return bond_release(bond_dev, slave_dev);
>+}
>+
>+static int bond_get_slave_count(const struct net_device *bond_dev)
>+{
>+ struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
>+
>+ return bond->slave_cnt;
>+}
>+
>+static struct net_device *bond_get_slave(const struct net_device *bond_dev,
>+ int slave_index)
>+{
>+ struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
>+ struct slave *slave;
>+ int i;
>+
>+ /* no need to hold bond->lock here, protected against writers by rtnl */
>+ bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, i) {
>+ if (slave_index == i)
>+ return slave->dev;
>+ }
>+ return NULL;
I think using the name "slave_index" for this variable is
confusing, since it isn't the ifindex of the slave. This "index" is
used to iterate through the list of slaves, so perhaps "slave_num" or
"slave_position" is clearer. The same comment applies to the equivalent
code for bridge.
-J
>+}
>+
> static int bond_xmit_roundrobin(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *bond_dev)
> {
> struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
>@@ -4657,6 +4691,10 @@ static const struct net_device_ops bond_netdev_ops = {
> .ndo_netpoll_cleanup = bond_netpoll_cleanup,
> .ndo_poll_controller = bond_poll_controller,
> #endif
>+ .ndo_add_slave = bond_add_slave,
>+ .ndo_del_slave = bond_del_slave,
>+ .ndo_get_slave_count = bond_get_slave_count,
>+ .ndo_get_slave = bond_get_slave,
> };
>
> static void bond_destructor(struct net_device *bond_dev)
>--
>1.7.3.4
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-11 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-11 15:21 [patch net-next-2.6 1/4] net: extend netlink interface to handle generic slave management Jiri Pirko
2011-02-11 15:22 ` [patch iproute2 2/4] implement slave management operations Jiri Pirko
2011-02-11 15:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-11 15:22 ` [patch net-next-2.6 3/4] bond: " Jiri Pirko
2011-02-11 17:19 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2011-02-11 17:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-12 13:16 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2011-02-12 13:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-11 15:23 ` [patch net-next-2.6 4/4] bridge: " Jiri Pirko
2011-02-28 22:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-02-28 22:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-01 6:19 ` Jiri Pirko
2011-02-11 15:48 ` [patch net-next-2.6 1/4] net: extend netlink interface to handle generic slave management Patrick McHardy
2011-02-11 17:40 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22104.1297444790@death \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jpirko@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).