From: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>
To: "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
'Linux Netdev List' <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
e1000-devel <e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: RE: [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang"
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:00:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2239047.Ns2P95dsQ1@storm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <309B89C4C689E141A5FF6A0C5FB2118B78D8BD39@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Aaron,
On Monday, 23. March 2015 22:37:08 Brown, Aaron F wrote:
> > >
> > > And with an internal reproduction of the issue I have created an
> >
> > internal
> >
> > > bug report, described my set of reproductions, referenced the similar
> > > external ones and assigned it to our current e1000e developer.
> >
> >
> > just wanted to quickly check if there has been any progress
> > since the internal bug report has been filed?
>
>
> No, no updates beyond a bit of investigation.
any news on this from the Intel labs?
Another two months passed ;) It would be nice to get rid
of the workaround that limits the max fragment size to 4096.
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 15:32 [bisected regression] e1000e: "Detected Hardware Unit Hang" Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-14 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 10:11 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 14:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 14:58 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 15:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 15:48 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 17:04 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-15 17:37 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 18:24 ` Re: Re: Re: " Eric Dumazet
2015-01-19 16:49 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-11 11:23 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-02-11 11:34 ` Jeff Kirsher
2015-02-12 23:28 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-02-13 16:14 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-02-21 1:59 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-03-23 13:58 ` Thomas Jarosch
2015-03-23 22:37 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-05-27 16:00 ` Thomas Jarosch [this message]
2015-05-30 1:18 ` Brown, Aaron F
2015-07-29 8:51 ` Thomas Jarosch
2019-05-02 12:58 ` Juliana Rodrigueiro
2015-02-12 1:18 ` nick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2239047.Ns2P95dsQ1@storm \
--to=thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com \
--cc=aaron.f.brown@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).