[PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] net: enetc: add port MDIO support for both i.MX94 and i.MX95

[PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] net: enetc: add port MDIO support for both i.MX94 and i.MX95

[Wei Fang]

The NETC IP has one external master MDIO interface (eMDIO) for managing
external PHYs, all ENETC ports share this eMDIO. The EMDIO function and
the ENETC port MDIO are the virtual ports of this eMDIO, ENETC can use
these virtual ports to access their PHYs. The difference is that EMDIO
function is a 'global port', it can access all the PHYs on the eMDIO, so
it provides a means for different software modules to share a single set
of MDIO signals to access their PHYs.

The ENETC port MDIO can only access its own external PHY. Furthermore,
its PHY address must be set to its corresponding LaBCR register in IERB
module, which is is a 64 KB size page containing registers that are used
for pre-boot initialization for all NETC PCIe functions. And this IERB
is owned by the host OS and it will be locked after the initialization,
so it cannot be configured at running time any more. The port MDIO can
only work properly when the PHY address accessed by it matches the value
of its corresponding LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD]. Otherwise, the MDIO access
by the port MDIO will not take effect.

Note that the same PHY is either controlled by port MDIO or by the EMDIO
function. The netc-blk-ctrl driver will only set the PHY address in the
LaBCR register corresponding to the ENETC when the ENETC node contains
an mdio child node, and the ENETC driver will only create the port MDIO
bus then. An example in DTS is as follows, the EMDIO function will not\
access this PHY.

enetc_port0 {
        phy-handle = <&ethphy0>;
        phy-mode = "rgmii-id";

        mdio {
                #address-cells = <1>;
                #size-cells = <0>;

                ethphy0: ethernet-phy@1 {
                        reg = <1>;
                };
        };
};

If users want to use EMDIO funtion to manage the PHY, they only need to
place the PHY node in the emdio node. The same PHY must not be placed
simultaneously within the ENETC node. An example in DTS to use EMDIO
is as below.

netc_emdio {
        ethphy0: ethernet-phy@1 {
                reg = <1>;
        };

        ethphy2: ethernet-phy@8 {
                reg = <8>;
        };
};

In the host OS, when there are multiple ENETCs, they can all access their
PHYs using their own port MDIO, or they can all access their PHYs using
the EMDIO function, or they can partially use port MDIO and partially use
the EMDIO function.

Another typical use case of port MDIO is the Jailhouse usage. An ENETC is
assigned to a guest OS. The EMDIO function will be unavailable in the
guest OS because EMDIO is controlled by the host OS. Therefore, the ENETC
can use its port MDIO to manage its external PHY in this situation. In
this use case, the host OS's root dtb will disable the ENETC node, so the
host OS's ENETC driver will not probe the ENETC and its PHY.

In addition, this series also adds the internal MDIO bus support, each
ENETC has an internal MDIO interface for managing on-die PHY (PCS) if it
has PCS layer.

---
v3 changes:
1. Change the subject, improve the commit message and cover letter
2. Get the PHY address from mdio node not from the phy-handle, so that
only the ENETC node contains the mdio child node, its PHY address will
be set to LaBCR register in IERB module
3. Add netc_get_emdio_phy_mask() to get PHY address mask from the EMDIO
mode, the same PHY address is not allowed to appear in both the ENETC
node and the EMDIO node at the same time, ensuring that the EMDIO bus
and port MDIO bus are mutually exclusive.
4. Add some error logs
v2 link: https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20251105043344.677592-1-wei.fang@nxp.com/
v2 changes:
Improve the commit message.
v1 link: https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20251030091538.581541-1-wei.fang@nxp.com/
---

Wei Fang (3):
  net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage
  net: enetc: set external PHY address in IERB for i.MX94 ENETC
  net: enetc: update the base address of port MDIO registers for ENETC
    v4

 .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h  |   6 +
 .../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c         |  14 +-
 .../ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c  | 198 +++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 215 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage

[Wei Fang]

The ENETC supports managing its own external PHY through its port MDIO
functionality. To use this function, the PHY address needs be set in the
corresponding LaBCR register in the Integrated Endpoint Register Block
(IERB), which is used for pre-boot initialization of NETC PCIe functions.
The port MDIO can only work properly when the PHY address accessed by the
port MDIO matches the corresponding LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD] value.

Because the ENETC driver only registers the MDIO bus (port MDIO bus) when
it detects an MDIO child node in its node, similarly, the netc-blk-ctrl
driver only resolves the PHY address and sets it in the corresponding
LaBCR when it detects an MDIO child node in the ENETC node.

Co-developed-by: Aziz Sellami <aziz.sellami@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Aziz Sellami <aziz.sellami@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
 .../ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c  | 141 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
index d7aee3c934d3..6dd54b0d9616 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
 #define IERB_EMDIOFAUXR			0x344
 #define IERB_T0FAUXR			0x444
 #define IERB_ETBCR(a)			(0x300c + 0x100 * (a))
+#define IERB_LBCR(a)			(0x1010 + 0x40 * (a))
+#define  LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr)	(((addr) & 0x1f) << 8)
+
 #define IERB_EFAUXR(a)			(0x3044 + 0x100 * (a))
 #define IERB_VFAUXR(a)			(0x4004 + 0x40 * (a))
 #define FAUXR_LDID			GENMASK(3, 0)
@@ -322,6 +325,142 @@ static int netc_unlock_ierb_with_warm_reset(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
 				 1000, 100000, true, priv->prb, PRB_NETCRR);
 }
 
+static int netc_get_phy_addr(struct device_node *np)
+{
+	struct device_node *mdio_node, *phy_node;
+	u32 addr = 0;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	mdio_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "mdio");
+	if (!mdio_node)
+		return 0;
+
+	phy_node = of_get_next_child(mdio_node, NULL);
+	if (!phy_node)
+		goto of_put_mdio_node;
+
+	err = of_property_read_u32(phy_node, "reg", &addr);
+	if (err)
+		goto of_put_phy_node;
+
+	if (addr >= PHY_MAX_ADDR)
+		err = -EINVAL;
+
+of_put_phy_node:
+	of_node_put(phy_node);
+
+of_put_mdio_node:
+	of_node_put(mdio_node);
+
+	return err ? err : addr;
+}
+
+static int netc_parse_emdio_phy_mask(struct device_node *np, u32 *phy_mask)
+{
+	u32 mask = 0;
+
+	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
+		u32 addr;
+		int err;
+
+		err = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &addr);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
+		if (addr >= PHY_MAX_ADDR)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		mask |= BIT(addr);
+	}
+
+	*phy_mask = mask;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int netc_get_emdio_phy_mask(struct device_node *np, u32 *phy_mask)
+{
+	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
+		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
+			if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,ee00"))
+				continue;
+
+			return netc_parse_emdio_phy_mask(gchild, phy_mask);
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	int bus_devfn, addr, err;
+	u32 phy_mask = 0;
+
+	err = netc_get_emdio_phy_mask(np, &phy_mask);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address mask\n");
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	/* Update the port EMDIO PHY address through parsing phy properties.
+	 * This is needed when using the port EMDIO but it's harmless when
+	 * using the central EMDIO. So apply it on all cases.
+	 */
+	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
+		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
+			if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,e101"))
+				continue;
+
+			bus_devfn = netc_of_pci_get_bus_devfn(gchild);
+			if (bus_devfn < 0) {
+				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get BDF number\n");
+				return bus_devfn;
+			}
+
+			addr = netc_get_phy_addr(gchild);
+			if (addr < 0) {
+				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address\n");
+				return addr;
+			}
+
+			if (phy_mask & BIT(addr)) {
+				dev_err(dev,
+					"Find same PHY address in EMDIO and ENETC node\n");
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+
+			/* The default value of LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD ] is
+			 * 0, so no need to set the register.
+			 */
+			if (!addr)
+				continue;
+
+			switch (bus_devfn) {
+			case IMX95_ENETC0_BUS_DEVFN:
+				netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_LBCR(0),
+					       LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr));
+				break;
+			case IMX95_ENETC1_BUS_DEVFN:
+				netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_LBCR(1),
+					       LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr));
+				break;
+			case IMX95_ENETC2_BUS_DEVFN:
+				netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_LBCR(2),
+					       LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr));
+				break;
+			default:
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int imx95_ierb_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -349,7 +488,7 @@ static int imx95_ierb_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	/* NETC TIMER */
 	netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_T0FAUXR, 7);
 
-	return 0;
+	return imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(pdev);
 }
 
 static int imx94_get_enetc_id(struct device_node *np)
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage

[Claudiu Manoil]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 12:26 PM
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in
> IERB for port MDIO usage
> 
> The ENETC supports managing its own external PHY through its port MDIO
> functionality. To use this function, the PHY address needs be set in the
> corresponding LaBCR register in the Integrated Endpoint Register Block
> (IERB), which is used for pre-boot initialization of NETC PCIe functions.
> The port MDIO can only work properly when the PHY address accessed by the
> port MDIO matches the corresponding LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD] value.
> 
> Because the ENETC driver only registers the MDIO bus (port MDIO bus) when
> it detects an MDIO child node in its node, similarly, the netc-blk-ctrl
> driver only resolves the PHY address and sets it in the corresponding
> LaBCR when it detects an MDIO child node in the ENETC node.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Aziz Sellami <aziz.sellami@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aziz Sellami <aziz.sellami@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage

[Alexander Stein]

Hi,

sorry for the very late reply. I didn't get the chance to boot our
i.MX95 based board (TQMa95xxSA) in the meantime.

Am Mittwoch, 19. November 2025, 11:25:55 CET schrieb Wei Fang:
> The ENETC supports managing its own external PHY through its port MDIO
> functionality. To use this function, the PHY address needs be set in the
> corresponding LaBCR register in the Integrated Endpoint Register Block
> (IERB), which is used for pre-boot initialization of NETC PCIe functions.
> The port MDIO can only work properly when the PHY address accessed by the
> port MDIO matches the corresponding LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD] value.
> 
> Because the ENETC driver only registers the MDIO bus (port MDIO bus) when
> it detects an MDIO child node in its node, similarly, the netc-blk-ctrl
> driver only resolves the PHY address and sets it in the corresponding
> LaBCR when it detects an MDIO child node in the ENETC node.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Aziz Sellami <aziz.sellami@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aziz Sellami <aziz.sellami@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---
>  .../ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c  | 141 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 140 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
> index d7aee3c934d3..6dd54b0d9616 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@
>  #define IERB_EMDIOFAUXR			0x344
>  #define IERB_T0FAUXR			0x444
>  #define IERB_ETBCR(a)			(0x300c + 0x100 * (a))
> +#define IERB_LBCR(a)			(0x1010 + 0x40 * (a))
> +#define  LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr)	(((addr) & 0x1f) << 8)
> +
>  #define IERB_EFAUXR(a)			(0x3044 + 0x100 * (a))
>  #define IERB_VFAUXR(a)			(0x4004 + 0x40 * (a))
>  #define FAUXR_LDID			GENMASK(3, 0)
> @@ -322,6 +325,142 @@ static int netc_unlock_ierb_with_warm_reset(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv)
>  				 1000, 100000, true, priv->prb, PRB_NETCRR);
>  }
>  
> +static int netc_get_phy_addr(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *mdio_node, *phy_node;
> +	u32 addr = 0;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	mdio_node = of_get_child_by_name(np, "mdio");
> +	if (!mdio_node)
> +		return 0;

If there is no 'mdio' node below enetc_portX node, then 0 is returned...

> +
> +	phy_node = of_get_next_child(mdio_node, NULL);
> +	if (!phy_node)
> +		goto of_put_mdio_node;
> +
> +	err = of_property_read_u32(phy_node, "reg", &addr);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto of_put_phy_node;
> +
> +	if (addr >= PHY_MAX_ADDR)
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +
> +of_put_phy_node:
> +	of_node_put(phy_node);
> +
> +of_put_mdio_node:
> +	of_node_put(mdio_node);
> +
> +	return err ? err : addr;
> +}
> +
> +static int netc_parse_emdio_phy_mask(struct device_node *np, u32 *phy_mask)
> +{
> +	u32 mask = 0;
> +
> +	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
> +		u32 addr;
> +		int err;
> +
> +		err = of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &addr);
> +		if (err)
> +			return err;
> +
> +		if (addr >= PHY_MAX_ADDR)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		mask |= BIT(addr);
> +	}
> +
> +	*phy_mask = mask;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int netc_get_emdio_phy_mask(struct device_node *np, u32 *phy_mask)
> +{
> +	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
> +		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
> +			if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,ee00"))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			return netc_parse_emdio_phy_mask(gchild, phy_mask);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	int bus_devfn, addr, err;
> +	u32 phy_mask = 0;
> +
> +	err = netc_get_emdio_phy_mask(np, &phy_mask);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address mask\n");
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Update the port EMDIO PHY address through parsing phy properties.
> +	 * This is needed when using the port EMDIO but it's harmless when
> +	 * using the central EMDIO. So apply it on all cases.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
> +		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
> +			if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,e101"))
> +				continue;
> +
> +			bus_devfn = netc_of_pci_get_bus_devfn(gchild);
> +			if (bus_devfn < 0) {
> +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get BDF number\n");
> +				return bus_devfn;
> +			}
> +
> +			addr = netc_get_phy_addr(gchild);
> +			if (addr < 0) {
> +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address\n");
> +				return addr;
> +			}
> +
> +			if (phy_mask & BIT(addr)) {

... which will break here if there is an Ethernet PHY using address 0 in 'netc_emdio' node.
See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa.dtsi node ethernet-phy@0.

Best regards,
Alexander

> +				dev_err(dev,
> +					"Find same PHY address in EMDIO and ENETC node\n");
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
> +
> +			/* The default value of LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD ] is
> +			 * 0, so no need to set the register.
> +			 */
> +			if (!addr)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			switch (bus_devfn) {
> +			case IMX95_ENETC0_BUS_DEVFN:
> +				netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_LBCR(0),
> +					       LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr));
> +				break;
> +			case IMX95_ENETC1_BUS_DEVFN:
> +				netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_LBCR(1),
> +					       LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr));
> +				break;
> +			case IMX95_ENETC2_BUS_DEVFN:
> +				netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_LBCR(2),
> +					       LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr));
> +				break;
> +			default:
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int imx95_ierb_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -349,7 +488,7 @@ static int imx95_ierb_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	/* NETC TIMER */
>  	netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_T0FAUXR, 7);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(pdev);
>  }
>  
>  static int imx94_get_enetc_id(struct device_node *np)
> 


-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/

RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage

[Wei Fang]

> > +static int imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(struct platform_device
> > +*pdev) {
> > +	struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	int bus_devfn, addr, err;
> > +	u32 phy_mask = 0;
> > +
> > +	err = netc_get_emdio_phy_mask(np, &phy_mask);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address mask\n");
> > +		return err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Update the port EMDIO PHY address through parsing phy properties.
> > +	 * This is needed when using the port EMDIO but it's harmless when
> > +	 * using the central EMDIO. So apply it on all cases.
> > +	 */
> > +	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
> > +		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
> > +			if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,e101"))
> > +				continue;
> > +
> > +			bus_devfn = netc_of_pci_get_bus_devfn(gchild);
> > +			if (bus_devfn < 0) {
> > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get BDF number\n");
> > +				return bus_devfn;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			addr = netc_get_phy_addr(gchild);
> > +			if (addr < 0) {
> > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address\n");
> > +				return addr;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			if (phy_mask & BIT(addr)) {
> 
> ... which will break here if there is an Ethernet PHY using address 0 in
> 'netc_emdio' node.
> See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa.dtsi node
> ethernet-phy@0.

AFAIU, the PHY address 0 is a special address, below is the description of
PHYAD from IEEE 802.3 Clause 22.

A PHY that is connected to the station management entity via the
mechanical interface defined in 22.6 shall always respond to transactions
addressed to PHY Address zero <00000>. A station management entity
that is attached to multiple PHYs must have prior knowledge of the 
appropriate PHY Address for each PHY.

Therefore, for most PHYs, PHY address 0 is typically used as the broadcast
address or default response address. In designs that control multiple PHYs
via EMDIO, it is recommended to avoid setting a specific PHY to address 0
to prevent bus conflicts.

If the PHY on your board does not use PHY address 0 as the broadcast address
or the default response address, then we should check the PHY address first and
then check the phy_mask in imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(), just the same
as imx94_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config().

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage

[Alexander Stein]

Hi,

Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2026, 04:52:01 CET schrieb Wei Fang:
> > > +static int imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(struct platform_device
> > > +*pdev) {
> > > +	struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > +	int bus_devfn, addr, err;
> > > +	u32 phy_mask = 0;
> > > +
> > > +	err = netc_get_emdio_phy_mask(np, &phy_mask);
> > > +	if (err) {
> > > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address mask\n");
> > > +		return err;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	/* Update the port EMDIO PHY address through parsing phy properties.
> > > +	 * This is needed when using the port EMDIO but it's harmless when
> > > +	 * using the central EMDIO. So apply it on all cases.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
> > > +		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
> > > +			if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,e101"))
> > > +				continue;
> > > +
> > > +			bus_devfn = netc_of_pci_get_bus_devfn(gchild);
> > > +			if (bus_devfn < 0) {
> > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get BDF number\n");
> > > +				return bus_devfn;
> > > +			}
> > > +
> > > +			addr = netc_get_phy_addr(gchild);
> > > +			if (addr < 0) {
> > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address\n");
> > > +				return addr;
> > > +			}
> > > +
> > > +			if (phy_mask & BIT(addr)) {
> > 
> > ... which will break here if there is an Ethernet PHY using address 0 in
> > 'netc_emdio' node.
> > See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa.dtsi node
> > ethernet-phy@0.
> 
> AFAIU, the PHY address 0 is a special address, below is the description of
> PHYAD from IEEE 802.3 Clause 22.
> 
> A PHY that is connected to the station management entity via the
> mechanical interface defined in 22.6 shall always respond to transactions
> addressed to PHY Address zero <00000>. A station management entity
> that is attached to multiple PHYs must have prior knowledge of the 
> appropriate PHY Address for each PHY.
> 
> Therefore, for most PHYs, PHY address 0 is typically used as the broadcast
> address or default response address. In designs that control multiple PHYs
> via EMDIO, it is recommended to avoid setting a specific PHY to address 0
> to prevent bus conflicts.

I know about this special meaning, but there are hardware design which do not
take this into account.

> If the PHY on your board does not use PHY address 0 as the broadcast address
> or the default response address, then we should check the PHY address first and
> then check the phy_mask in imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(), just the same
> as imx94_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config().

I'm not sure if this is the right fix. What about the case where phy_mask is
supposed to be 0, because there are no PHY subnodes of netc_emdio. Instead
the PHY with address is a subnode of the enet_portX is supposed to have
netc_get_phy_addr() return 0 because that's the actual address. But with
the current flow from imx94_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config() and your suggestion
for i.MX95 case we erroneously skip that node.

Best regards,
Alexander
-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/

RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage

[Wei Fang]

> Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2026, 04:52:01 CET schrieb Wei Fang:
> > > > +static int imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(struct platform_device
> > > > +*pdev) {
> > > > +	struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > +	int bus_devfn, addr, err;
> > > > +	u32 phy_mask = 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +	err = netc_get_emdio_phy_mask(np, &phy_mask);
> > > > +	if (err) {
> > > > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address mask\n");
> > > > +		return err;
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* Update the port EMDIO PHY address through parsing phy
> properties.
> > > > +	 * This is needed when using the port EMDIO but it's harmless when
> > > > +	 * using the central EMDIO. So apply it on all cases.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
> > > > +		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
> > > > +			if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,e101"))
> > > > +				continue;
> > > > +
> > > > +			bus_devfn = netc_of_pci_get_bus_devfn(gchild);
> > > > +			if (bus_devfn < 0) {
> > > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get BDF number\n");
> > > > +				return bus_devfn;
> > > > +			}
> > > > +
> > > > +			addr = netc_get_phy_addr(gchild);
> > > > +			if (addr < 0) {
> > > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address\n");
> > > > +				return addr;
> > > > +			}
> > > > +
> > > > +			if (phy_mask & BIT(addr)) {
> > >
> > > ... which will break here if there is an Ethernet PHY using address 0 in
> > > 'netc_emdio' node.
> > > See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa.dtsi node
> > > ethernet-phy@0.
> >
> > AFAIU, the PHY address 0 is a special address, below is the description of
> > PHYAD from IEEE 802.3 Clause 22.
> >
> > A PHY that is connected to the station management entity via the
> > mechanical interface defined in 22.6 shall always respond to transactions
> > addressed to PHY Address zero <00000>. A station management entity
> > that is attached to multiple PHYs must have prior knowledge of the
> > appropriate PHY Address for each PHY.
> >
> > Therefore, for most PHYs, PHY address 0 is typically used as the broadcast
> > address or default response address. In designs that control multiple PHYs
> > via EMDIO, it is recommended to avoid setting a specific PHY to address 0
> > to prevent bus conflicts.
> 
> I know about this special meaning, but there are hardware design which do not
> take this into account.

This might cause potential issues, as all PHYs attached to the same MDIO bus will
respond to the accesses to PHY address 0. Is this problem unfixable?

> 
> > If the PHY on your board does not use PHY address 0 as the broadcast address
> > or the default response address, then we should check the PHY address first
> and
> > then check the phy_mask in imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(), just the
> same
> > as imx94_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config().
> 
> I'm not sure if this is the right fix. What about the case where phy_mask is
> supposed to be 0, because there are no PHY subnodes of netc_emdio. Instead
> the PHY with address is a subnode of the enet_portX is supposed to have
> netc_get_phy_addr() return 0 because that's the actual address. But with
> the current flow from imx94_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config() and your suggestion
> for i.MX95 case we erroneously skip that node.
> 

The hardware default value is 0, so no need to configure it. I can send a
fix patch this week.

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage

[Alexander Stein]

Am Montag, 2. März 2026, 10:24:14 CET schrieb Wei Fang:
> > Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2026, 04:52:01 CET schrieb Wei Fang:
> > > > > +static int imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(struct platform_device
> > > > > +*pdev) {
> > > > > +	struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > > +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > > > +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > > +	int bus_devfn, addr, err;
> > > > > +	u32 phy_mask = 0;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	err = netc_get_emdio_phy_mask(np, &phy_mask);
> > > > > +	if (err) {
> > > > > +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address mask\n");
> > > > > +		return err;
> > > > > +	}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	/* Update the port EMDIO PHY address through parsing phy
> > properties.
> > > > > +	 * This is needed when using the port EMDIO but it's harmless when
> > > > > +	 * using the central EMDIO. So apply it on all cases.
> > > > > +	 */
> > > > > +	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
> > > > > +		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
> > > > > +			if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,e101"))
> > > > > +				continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +			bus_devfn = netc_of_pci_get_bus_devfn(gchild);
> > > > > +			if (bus_devfn < 0) {
> > > > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get BDF number\n");
> > > > > +				return bus_devfn;
> > > > > +			}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +			addr = netc_get_phy_addr(gchild);
> > > > > +			if (addr < 0) {
> > > > > +				dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address\n");
> > > > > +				return addr;
> > > > > +			}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +			if (phy_mask & BIT(addr)) {
> > > >
> > > > ... which will break here if there is an Ethernet PHY using address 0 in
> > > > 'netc_emdio' node.
> > > > See arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-tqma9596sa.dtsi node
> > > > ethernet-phy@0.
> > >
> > > AFAIU, the PHY address 0 is a special address, below is the description of
> > > PHYAD from IEEE 802.3 Clause 22.
> > >
> > > A PHY that is connected to the station management entity via the
> > > mechanical interface defined in 22.6 shall always respond to transactions
> > > addressed to PHY Address zero <00000>. A station management entity
> > > that is attached to multiple PHYs must have prior knowledge of the
> > > appropriate PHY Address for each PHY.
> > >
> > > Therefore, for most PHYs, PHY address 0 is typically used as the broadcast
> > > address or default response address. In designs that control multiple PHYs
> > > via EMDIO, it is recommended to avoid setting a specific PHY to address 0
> > > to prevent bus conflicts.
> > 
> > I know about this special meaning, but there are hardware design which do not
> > take this into account.
> 
> This might cause potential issues, as all PHYs attached to the same MDIO bus will
> respond to the accesses to PHY address 0.

Is that really the case? So far we didn't have any problems with
PHYAD 0 and 3 on the same bus. I did a bit of research but couldn't find any
information backing that PHYAD 0 is actually a broadcast address. All I could
find is the case with just a single PHY on a MDIO bus, defaulting to 0.

> Is this problem unfixable?

Right now our problem is that the software doesn't work any more.

> > 
> > > If the PHY on your board does not use PHY address 0 as the broadcast address
> > > or the default response address, then we should check the PHY address first
> > and
> > > then check the phy_mask in imx95_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(), just the
> > same
> > > as imx94_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config().
> > 
> > I'm not sure if this is the right fix. What about the case where phy_mask is
> > supposed to be 0, because there are no PHY subnodes of netc_emdio. Instead
> > the PHY with address is a subnode of the enet_portX is supposed to have
> > netc_get_phy_addr() return 0 because that's the actual address. But with
> > the current flow from imx94_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config() and your suggestion
> > for i.MX95 case we erroneously skip that node.
> > 
> 
> The hardware default value is 0, so no need to configure it. I can send a
> fix patch this week.

Okay, thanks.

Best regards,
Alexander
-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/

RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage

[Wei Fang]

> > > > AFAIU, the PHY address 0 is a special address, below is the description of
> > > > PHYAD from IEEE 802.3 Clause 22.
> > > >
> > > > A PHY that is connected to the station management entity via the
> > > > mechanical interface defined in 22.6 shall always respond to transactions
> > > > addressed to PHY Address zero <00000>. A station management entity
> > > > that is attached to multiple PHYs must have prior knowledge of the
> > > > appropriate PHY Address for each PHY.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore, for most PHYs, PHY address 0 is typically used as the broadcast
> > > > address or default response address. In designs that control multiple PHYs
> > > > via EMDIO, it is recommended to avoid setting a specific PHY to address 0
> > > > to prevent bus conflicts.
> > >
> > > I know about this special meaning, but there are hardware design which do
> not
> > > take this into account.
> >
> > This might cause potential issues, as all PHYs attached to the same MDIO bus
> will
> > respond to the accesses to PHY address 0.
> 
> Is that really the case? So far we didn't have any problems with
> PHYAD 0 and 3 on the same bus. I did a bit of research but couldn't find any
> information backing that PHYAD 0 is actually a broadcast address. All I could
> find is the case with just a single PHY on a MDIO bus, defaulting to 0.
> 

There is no problem if there is only a single PHY on the bus. But if there are
multiple PHYs, as address 0 is the default response address, there PHYs will
respond to transactions addressed to PHY address 0.

The reason you didn't see the problem is because the two PHYs on your
boards are the same model, so their configurations are identical. However,
if you disable the PHY with address 0 via the MDIO bus, both PHYs might
be disabled.

> > Is this problem unfixable?
> 
> Right now our problem is that the software doesn't work any more.
> 

I'm sorry, but I still recommend against using address 0 when there are
multiple PHYs on the MDIO bus.

[PATCH v3 net-next 2/3] net: enetc: set external PHY address in IERB for i.MX94 ENETC

[Wei Fang]

NETC IP has only one external master MDIO interface (eMDIO) for managing
the external PHYs. ENETC can use the interfaces provided by the EMDIO
function or its port MDIO to access and manage its external PHY. Both
the EMDIO function and the port MDIO are all virtual ports of the eMDIO.

The difference is that the EMDIO function is a 'global port', it can
access all the PHYs on the eMDIO, but port MDIO can only access its own
PHY. To ensure that ENETC can only access its own PHY through port MDIO,
LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD] needs to be set, which represents the address of
the external PHY connected to ENETC. If the accessed PHY address is not
consistent with LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD], then the MDIO access initiated
by port MDIO will be invalid.

Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
 .../ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c  | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
index 6dd54b0d9616..443983fdecd9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/netc_blk_ctrl.c
@@ -563,12 +563,64 @@ static int imx94_enetc_update_tid(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int imx94_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv,
+					   struct device_node *np,
+					   u32 phy_mask)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &priv->pdev->dev;
+	int bus_devfn, addr;
+
+	bus_devfn = netc_of_pci_get_bus_devfn(np);
+	if (bus_devfn < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get BDF number\n");
+		return bus_devfn;
+	}
+
+	addr = netc_get_phy_addr(np);
+	if (addr <= 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY address\n");
+		return addr;
+	}
+
+	if (phy_mask & BIT(addr)) {
+		dev_err(dev,
+			"Find same PHY address in EMDIO and ENETC node\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	switch (bus_devfn) {
+	case IMX94_ENETC0_BUS_DEVFN:
+		netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_LBCR(IMX94_ENETC0_LINK),
+			       LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr));
+		break;
+	case IMX94_ENETC1_BUS_DEVFN:
+		netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_LBCR(IMX94_ENETC1_LINK),
+			       LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr));
+		break;
+	case IMX94_ENETC2_BUS_DEVFN:
+		netc_reg_write(priv->ierb, IERB_LBCR(IMX94_ENETC2_LINK),
+			       LBCR_MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD(addr));
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int imx94_ierb_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct netc_blk_ctrl *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	u32 phy_mask = 0;
 	int err;
 
+	err = netc_get_emdio_phy_mask(np, &phy_mask);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get PHY address mask\n");
+		return err;
+	}
+
 	for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
 		for_each_child_of_node_scoped(child, gchild) {
 			if (!of_device_is_compatible(gchild, "pci1131,e101"))
@@ -577,6 +629,11 @@ static int imx94_ierb_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			err = imx94_enetc_update_tid(priv, gchild);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
+
+			err = imx94_enetc_mdio_phyaddr_config(priv, gchild,
+							      phy_mask);
+			if (err)
+				return err;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/3] net: enetc: set external PHY address in IERB for i.MX94 ENETC

[Claudiu Manoil]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 12:26 PM
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/3] net: enetc: set external PHY address in IERB
> for i.MX94 ENETC
> 
> NETC IP has only one external master MDIO interface (eMDIO) for managing
> the external PHYs. ENETC can use the interfaces provided by the EMDIO
> function or its port MDIO to access and manage its external PHY. Both
> the EMDIO function and the port MDIO are all virtual ports of the eMDIO.
> 
> The difference is that the EMDIO function is a 'global port', it can
> access all the PHYs on the eMDIO, but port MDIO can only access its own
> PHY. To ensure that ENETC can only access its own PHY through port MDIO,
> LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD] needs to be set, which represents the address
> of
> the external PHY connected to ENETC. If the accessed PHY address is not
> consistent with LaBCR[MDIO_PHYAD_PRTAD], then the MDIO access initiated
> by port MDIO will be invalid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>

[PATCH v3 net-next 3/3] net: enetc: update the base address of port MDIO registers for ENETC v4

[Wei Fang]

Each ENETC has a set of external MDIO registers to access its external
PHY based on its port EMDIO bus, these registers are used for MDIO bus
access, such as setting the PHY address, PHY register address and value,
read or write operations, C22 or C45 format, etc. The base address of
this set of registers has been modified in ENETC v4 and is different
from that in ENETC v1. So the base address needs to be updated so that
ENETC v4 can use port MDIO to manage its own external PHY.

Additionally, if ENETC has the PCS layer, it also has a set of internal
MDIO registers for managing its on-die PHY (PCS/Serdes). The base address
of this set of registers is also different from that of ENETC v1, so the
base address also needs to be updated so that ENETC v4 can support the
management of on-die PHY through the internal MDIO bus.

Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h   |  6 ++++++
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
index ebea4298791c..3ed0f7a02767 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h
@@ -170,6 +170,9 @@
 /* Port MAC 0/1 Maximum Frame Length Register */
 #define ENETC4_PM_MAXFRM(mac)		(0x5014 + (mac) * 0x400)
 
+/* Port internal MDIO base address, use to access PCS */
+#define ENETC4_PM_IMDIO_BASE		0x5030
+
 /* Port MAC 0/1 Pause Quanta Register */
 #define ENETC4_PM_PAUSE_QUANTA(mac)	(0x5054 + (mac) * 0x400)
 
@@ -198,6 +201,9 @@
 #define   SSP_1G			2
 #define  PM_IF_MODE_ENA			BIT(15)
 
+/* Port external MDIO Base address, use to access off-chip PHY */
+#define ENETC4_EMDIO_BASE		0x5c00
+
 /**********************ENETC Pseudo MAC port registers************************/
 /* Port pseudo MAC receive octets counter (64-bit) */
 #define ENETC4_PPMROCR			0x5080
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
index 9c634205e2a7..76263b8566bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
@@ -176,7 +176,12 @@ static int enetc_mdio_probe(struct enetc_pf *pf, struct device_node *np)
 	bus->parent = dev;
 	mdio_priv = bus->priv;
 	mdio_priv->hw = &pf->si->hw;
-	mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC_EMDIO_BASE;
+
+	if (is_enetc_rev1(pf->si))
+		mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC_EMDIO_BASE;
+	else
+		mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC4_EMDIO_BASE;
+
 	snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s", dev_name(dev));
 
 	err = of_mdiobus_register(bus, np);
@@ -221,7 +226,12 @@ static int enetc_imdio_create(struct enetc_pf *pf)
 	bus->phy_mask = ~0;
 	mdio_priv = bus->priv;
 	mdio_priv->hw = &pf->si->hw;
-	mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC_PM_IMDIO_BASE;
+
+	if (is_enetc_rev1(pf->si))
+		mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC_PM_IMDIO_BASE;
+	else
+		mdio_priv->mdio_base = ENETC4_PM_IMDIO_BASE;
+
 	snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, "%s-imdio", dev_name(dev));
 
 	err = mdiobus_register(bus);
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/3] net: enetc: update the base address of port MDIO registers for ENETC v4

[Claudiu Manoil]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 12:26 PM
[...]
> Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/3] net: enetc: update the base address of port
> MDIO registers for ENETC v4
> 
> Each ENETC has a set of external MDIO registers to access its external
> PHY based on its port EMDIO bus, these registers are used for MDIO bus
> access, such as setting the PHY address, PHY register address and value,
> read or write operations, C22 or C45 format, etc. The base address of
> this set of registers has been modified in ENETC v4 and is different
> from that in ENETC v1. So the base address needs to be updated so that
> ENETC v4 can use port MDIO to manage its own external PHY.
> 
> Additionally, if ENETC has the PCS layer, it also has a set of internal
> MDIO registers for managing its on-die PHY (PCS/Serdes). The base address
> of this set of registers is also different from that of ENETC v1, so the
> base address also needs to be updated so that ENETC v4 can support the
> management of on-die PHY through the internal MDIO bus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/3] net: enetc: update the base address of port MDIO registers for ENETC v4

[Paolo Abeni]

On 11/19/25 11:25 AM, Wei Fang wrote:
> Each ENETC has a set of external MDIO registers to access its external
> PHY based on its port EMDIO bus, these registers are used for MDIO bus
> access, such as setting the PHY address, PHY register address and value,
> read or write operations, C22 or C45 format, etc. The base address of
> this set of registers has been modified in ENETC v4 and is different
> from that in ENETC v1. So the base address needs to be updated so that
> ENETC v4 can use port MDIO to manage its own external PHY.
> 
> Additionally, if ENETC has the PCS layer, it also has a set of internal
> MDIO registers for managing its on-die PHY (PCS/Serdes). The base address
> of this set of registers is also different from that of ENETC v1, so the
> base address also needs to be updated so that ENETC v4 can support the
> management of on-die PHY through the internal MDIO bus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>

Andrew, it's not clear to me if you are with the current patch version,
could you please chime-in?

Thanks,

Paolo

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/3] net: enetc: update the base address of port MDIO registers for ENETC v4

[Andrew Lunn]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 11:05:06AM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 11/19/25 11:25 AM, Wei Fang wrote:
> > Each ENETC has a set of external MDIO registers to access its external
> > PHY based on its port EMDIO bus, these registers are used for MDIO bus
> > access, such as setting the PHY address, PHY register address and value,
> > read or write operations, C22 or C45 format, etc. The base address of
> > this set of registers has been modified in ENETC v4 and is different
> > from that in ENETC v1. So the base address needs to be updated so that
> > ENETC v4 can use port MDIO to manage its own external PHY.
> > 
> > Additionally, if ENETC has the PCS layer, it also has a set of internal
> > MDIO registers for managing its on-die PHY (PCS/Serdes). The base address
> > of this set of registers is also different from that of ENETC v1, so the
> > base address also needs to be updated so that ENETC v4 can support the
> > management of on-die PHY through the internal MDIO bus.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> 
> Andrew, it's not clear to me if you are with the current patch version,
> could you please chime-in?

I say merge it. I'm not sure it is the best of architectures, but i
don't have time to dig into all the details in order to suggest
something better.

	Andrew

Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/3] net: enetc: add port MDIO support for both i.MX94 and i.MX95

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 18:25:54 +0800 you wrote:
> The NETC IP has one external master MDIO interface (eMDIO) for managing
> external PHYs, all ENETC ports share this eMDIO. The EMDIO function and
> the ENETC port MDIO are the virtual ports of this eMDIO, ENETC can use
> these virtual ports to access their PHYs. The difference is that EMDIO
> function is a 'global port', it can access all the PHYs on the eMDIO, so
> it provides a means for different software modules to share a single set
> of MDIO signals to access their PHYs.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3,net-next,1/3] net: enetc: set the external PHY address in IERB for port MDIO usage
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/6633df05f3ad
  - [v3,net-next,2/3] net: enetc: set external PHY address in IERB for i.MX94 ENETC
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/50bfd9c06f0f
  - [v3,net-next,3/3] net: enetc: update the base address of port MDIO registers for ENETC v4
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/10ba23a7f6cc

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html