From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: ethernet QoS support? Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 10:46:25 -0500 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <2290273A-D1BF-11D8-B72C-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> References: <1C440F3C-D110-11D8-8B61-000393DBC2E8@freescale.com> <40ED9A1C.4040707@pobox.com> <1089316845.1072.1.camel@jzny.localdomain> <200407091002.26410.vkondra@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , Kumar Gala , , Jeff Garzik Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200407091002.26410.vkondra@mail.ru> To: Vladimir Kondratiev Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Jul 9, 2004, at 2:02 AM, Vladimir Kondratiev wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I guess, Kumar is asking for support for several Tx queues with > different > priorities. One need to start/stop these queues separately. This is > dictated > by presense of different priorities on physical layer. > > Kumar, is it 802.11? WME or TGE? I'm not sure what WME or TGE stand for, we are looking at a gig-e controller. > > Vladimir. > > On Thursday 08 July 2004 23:00, jamal wrote: >> On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 15:01, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> Jeff, >>>> >>>> I was wondering if there was any support for handling ethernet >>>> devices >>>> that support multiple RX/TX queues to provide QoS. If so any >>>> pointers >>>> would be great. >>> >>> IIRC skb->priority provides priority bands for TX. Not sure about >>> RX... >>> jamal? >> >> The question was very ambigous. >> What is it that Kumar is looking for? Is it 802.1p, IP level etc? >> >> cheers, >> jamal > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFA7kMCqxdj7mhC6o0RAkeKAJ96kf49fbVy4qOjqqBBuNzmCteTrQCfU55Q > ke3RQ2prgMLEssvjeQIgegs= > =/KHu > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----