From: Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@linux.dev>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, jiang.biao@linux.dev,
bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/11] bpf: change prototype of bpf_session_{cookie,is_return}
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 10:19:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22969680.EfDdHjke4D@7940hx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzYid4WaAkNLBegeN5FLiLTjZ1scToA-Sdpz3tqL6iE=Tw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2026/1/14 09:22 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> write:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 6:12 AM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add the function argument of "void *ctx" to bpf_session_cookie() and
> > bpf_session_is_return(), which is a preparation of the next patch.
> >
> > The two kfunc is seldom used now, so it will not introduce much effect
> > to change their function prototype.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++--
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h | 4 ++--
> > .../bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_session_cookie.c | 12 ++++++------
> > .../selftests/bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session.c | 4 ++--
> > .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_cookie.c | 12 ++++++------
> > .../bpf/progs/uprobe_multi_session_recursive.c | 8 ++++----
> > 6 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
>
> LGTM, let's do it
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
>
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 5f621f0403f8..297dcafb2c55 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -3316,7 +3316,7 @@ static u64 bpf_uprobe_multi_entry_ip(struct bpf_run_ctx *ctx)
> >
> > __bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
> >
> > -__bpf_kfunc bool bpf_session_is_return(void)
> > +__bpf_kfunc bool bpf_session_is_return(void *ctx)
> > {
> > struct bpf_session_run_ctx *session_ctx;
> >
> > @@ -3324,7 +3324,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_session_is_return(void)
> > return session_ctx->is_return;
> > }
> >
> > -__bpf_kfunc __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void)
> > +__bpf_kfunc __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void *ctx)
> > {
> > struct bpf_session_run_ctx *session_ctx;
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
> > index e0189254bb6e..dc495cb4c22e 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_kfuncs.h
> > @@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ extern int bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr *data_ptr,
> > struct bpf_dynptr *sig_ptr,
> > struct bpf_key *trusted_keyring) __ksym;
> >
> > -extern bool bpf_session_is_return(void) __ksym __weak;
> > -extern __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void) __ksym __weak;
> > +extern bool bpf_session_is_return(void *ctx) __ksym __weak;
> > +extern __u64 *bpf_session_cookie(void *ctx) __ksym __weak;
> >
>
> (and actually drop these, vmlinux.h will have them)
OK, I'll drop these in the next version.
>
> > struct dentry;
> > /* Description
>
> [...]
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-14 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-10 14:11 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/11] bpf: fsession support Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/11] bpf: add " Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 1:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-14 2:10 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 18:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-15 2:05 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-15 8:33 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/11] bpf: use last 8-bits for the nr_args in trampoline Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 1:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-14 2:19 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 9:52 ` David Laight
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/11] bpf: change prototype of bpf_session_{cookie,is_return} Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 1:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-14 2:19 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/11] bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_is_return Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 1:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-14 2:25 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/11] bpf: support fsession for bpf_session_cookie Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:42 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-01-11 1:54 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 1:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-14 2:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-14 2:38 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 2:48 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/11] bpf,x86: introduce emit_store_stack_imm64() for trampoline Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 1:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-14 2:31 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/11] bpf,x86: add fsession support for x86_64 Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 1:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-14 3:27 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 3:35 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 19:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-15 2:12 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/11] libbpf: add fsession support Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 1:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-01-14 3:27 ` Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/11] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/11] selftests/bpf: add testcases for fsession cookie Menglong Dong
2026-01-10 14:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 11/11] selftests/bpf: test fsession mixed with fentry and fexit Menglong Dong
2026-01-14 2:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/11] bpf: fsession support Alexei Starovoitov
2026-01-14 2:52 ` Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22969680.EfDdHjke4D@7940hx \
--to=menglong.dong@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiang.biao@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox