From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: [v2] can: Use common error handling code in vxcan_newlink() Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:37:11 +0100 Message-ID: <2346609d-85f6-6eec-e492-d15ba1b6489a@users.sourceforge.net> References: <2e600d9a-faec-dd39-08f0-5a7fb260d7ca@users.sourceforge.net> <2ab5d794-7a5c-9036-835c-67cfcc541795@hartkopp.net> <264b3c2b-8354-5769-639c-ac8d2fcbe630@hartkopp.net> <23fbbdba-fb11-a6bc-7d6a-4af43ef79503@users.sourceforge.net> <08fd31d5-8677-81e7-65d6-40d501017db6@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org To: Oliver Hartkopp , Marc Kleine-Budde , Wolfgang Grandegger , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <08fd31d5-8677-81e7-65d6-40d501017db6@hartkopp.net> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp Thanks for another positive feedback. > Again: Posting such a patch on linux-can@vger.kernel.org is ENOUGH! I was informed in an other way for Linux software patches. > No need to cross post such a patch additionally on > > netdev@vger.kernel.org > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org These addresses were suggested (or recommended?) by the script “get_maintainer.pl”. > kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org I tend to add this address also for my update suggestions. > and to each of the maintainers … > We all subscribed the mailing list and listen to it. This is generally fine. - But I do not know how long such subscriptions will be active. > That's the intention of a mailing list ... I know … > Cross posting is not appreciated in the community. How does this view fit to the information in the section “5) Select the recipients for your patch” from the document “submitting-patches.rst”? Regards, Markus