From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:04:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23552.1173395045@death> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703081350510.25051@potato.cts.ucla.edu>
Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu> wrote:
>It's active-backup. Testing with the same setup and e100 works fine. I've
>done a few tests without the bonding module, using the dual-port
>separately.
Somebody else a couple of weeks ago was having similar issues
running bonding with skge (in 802.3ad mode, in his case) that also
vanished with different hardware. I don't have any skge hardware, so I
can't test it here. His problem was a failure in 802.3ad negotiation,
not a system lockup, though.
If you're running active-backup and not using the ARP monitor
(arp_interval), then I'm not aware of any possible locking problems in
bonding for the kernel version you reference (2.6.20.1).
>1) ip link set mtu 9000 eth2 <-- eth2 is no longer responsive
> ip link set mtu 1500 eth2 <-- eth2 remains unresponsive
>
>2) ifup eth2
> ifdown eth2
>
> perl -pi -e 's/eth2/eth3/' /etc/network/interfaces
>
> ifup eth3 <-- locks up here
This would seem to suggest a problem with skge itself, although
there might be some other interaction with bonding that causes the
problems for that case.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-08 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-08 19:20 skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch) Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 19:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 21:31 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 21:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 22:23 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 23:04 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2007-03-08 23:13 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 22:09 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 22:16 ` [PATCH] skge: set mac address bonding fix Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-12 22:39 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 23:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-13 0:37 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-15 14:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 22:28 ` skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch) Chris Stromsoe
2007-05-09 0:06 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 21:37 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23552.1173395045@death \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cbs@cts.ucla.edu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).