netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch)
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:04:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23552.1173395045@death> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703081350510.25051@potato.cts.ucla.edu>

Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu> wrote:

>It's active-backup.  Testing with the same setup and e100 works fine. I've
>done a few tests without the bonding module, using the dual-port
>separately.

	Somebody else a couple of weeks ago was having similar issues
running bonding with skge (in 802.3ad mode, in his case) that also
vanished with different hardware.  I don't have any skge hardware, so I
can't test it here.  His problem was a failure in 802.3ad negotiation,
not a system lockup, though.

	If you're running active-backup and not using the ARP monitor
(arp_interval), then I'm not aware of any possible locking problems in
bonding for the kernel version you reference (2.6.20.1).

>1) ip link set mtu 9000 eth2  <-- eth2 is no longer responsive
>   ip link set mtu 1500 eth2  <-- eth2 remains unresponsive
>
>2) ifup eth2
>   ifdown eth2
>
>   perl -pi -e 's/eth2/eth3/' /etc/network/interfaces
>
>   ifup eth3   <--  locks up here

	This would seem to suggest a problem with skge itself, although
there might be some other interaction with bonding that causes the
problems for that case.

	-J

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-08 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-08 19:20 skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch) Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 19:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 21:31   ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 21:48     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-08 22:23       ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 23:04         ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2007-03-08 23:13           ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 22:09             ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 22:16               ` [PATCH] skge: set mac address bonding fix Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-12 22:39                 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-12 23:18                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-03-13  0:37                     ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-15 14:35                 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-08 22:28               ` skge- "soft lockup on CPU#0" with mtu=9000 (2.6.20.1 + web100 patch) Chris Stromsoe
2007-05-09  0:06                 ` Chris Stromsoe
2007-03-08 21:37 ` Jay Vosburgh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23552.1173395045@death \
    --to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=cbs@cts.ucla.edu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).