* [PATCH] NET: Mark snmp4_icmp_list[] as being unused
@ 2007-10-25 13:36 David Howells
2007-10-25 22:10 ` David Stevens
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2007-10-25 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: dhowells
Mark snmp4_icmp_list[] as being unused to avoid the warning it would otherwise
incur.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/proc.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/proc.c b/net/ipv4/proc.c
index fd16cb8..1c0854d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/proc.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/proc.c
@@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp4_ipextstats_list[] = {
SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
};
-static const struct snmp_mib snmp4_icmp_list[] = {
+static __attribute__((unused))
+const struct snmp_mib snmp4_icmp_list[] = {
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InMsgs", ICMP_MIB_INMSGS),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InErrors", ICMP_MIB_INERRORS),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("OutMsgs", ICMP_MIB_OUTMSGS),
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NET: Mark snmp4_icmp_list[] as being unused
2007-10-25 13:36 [PATCH] NET: Mark snmp4_icmp_list[] as being unused David Howells
@ 2007-10-25 22:10 ` David Stevens
2007-10-25 23:05 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Stevens @ 2007-10-25 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells; +Cc: dhowells, netdev, netdev-owner
What about just removing it, or do you think it's
useful for documentation of the order? Either way,
Acked-by: David L Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
+-DLS
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NET: Mark snmp4_icmp_list[] as being unused
2007-10-25 22:10 ` David Stevens
@ 2007-10-25 23:05 ` David Howells
2007-10-26 1:27 ` David Stevens
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2007-10-25 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Stevens; +Cc: dhowells, netdev, netdev-owner
David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> What about just removing it, or do you think it's
> useful for documentation of the order? Either way,
I don't know whether it's intended to be used for something, perhaps a
debugging macro. Perhaps it should be #if'd out instead.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NET: Mark snmp4_icmp_list[] as being unused
2007-10-25 23:05 ` David Howells
@ 2007-10-26 1:27 ` David Stevens
2007-10-26 1:40 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Stevens @ 2007-10-26 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells; +Cc: dhowells, netdev, netdev-owner
dhowells@redhat.com wrote on 10/25/2007 04:05:13 PM:
> David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > What about just removing it, or do you think it's
> > useful for documentation of the order? Either way,
>
> I don't know whether it's intended to be used for something, perhaps a
> debugging macro. Perhaps it should be #if'd out instead.
It was used for /proc/net/snmp header printing, but
most of the items in it were moved to a different MIB (by me).
The new values are printed in a backward-compatible way, but
maintaining the old order means not using this header map.
So, long-winded way of saying I believe it should be
removed, but I missed that when I made it obsolete. :-)
+-DLS
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NET: Mark snmp4_icmp_list[] as being unused
2007-10-26 1:27 ` David Stevens
@ 2007-10-26 1:40 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2007-10-26 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dlstevens; +Cc: dhowells, netdev, netdev-owner
From: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:27:22 -0700
> dhowells@redhat.com wrote on 10/25/2007 04:05:13 PM:
>
> > David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > What about just removing it, or do you think it's
> > > useful for documentation of the order? Either way,
> >
> > I don't know whether it's intended to be used for something, perhaps a
> > debugging macro. Perhaps it should be #if'd out instead.
>
> It was used for /proc/net/snmp header printing, but
> most of the items in it were moved to a different MIB (by me).
> The new values are printed in a backward-compatible way, but
> maintaining the old order means not using this header map.
> So, long-winded way of saying I believe it should be
> removed, but I missed that when I made it obsolete. :-)
I've checked just such a change into my tree.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-26 1:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-25 13:36 [PATCH] NET: Mark snmp4_icmp_list[] as being unused David Howells
2007-10-25 22:10 ` David Stevens
2007-10-25 23:05 ` David Howells
2007-10-26 1:27 ` David Stevens
2007-10-26 1:40 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).