From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico_Wang?= Subject: Re: 2.6.33 dies on modprobe Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:08:16 +0800 Message-ID: <2375c9f91003030108h43973d0cw713d1004dd912389@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100228221257.GA8858@invalid> <2375c9f91002282022n29e83858jd8cadbb2e664b436@mail.gmail.com> <20100301090708.GF17929@forwiss.uni-passau.de> <2375c9f91003030058h7456b5e1odc8ca958f5af2c0d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: =?UTF-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico_Wang?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Network Developers Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2375c9f91003030058h7456b5e1odc8ca958f5af2c0d@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Am=C3=A9rico Wang wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:07 PM, M G Berberich > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Am Montag, den 01. M=C3=A4rz schrieb Am=C3=A9rico Wang: >>> On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:12 AM, M G Berberich >>> wrote: >> >>> > I tried to build a 2.6.33 kernel but on boot it dies on modprobe >>> > (kernel-Oops). This might be the result of faulty config, but I'm >>> > totaly clueless what's the fault. >>> > >>> > The kernel starts up fine and mounts the root-filesystem, but the= n >>> > dies on the first modprobe executed. I can boot it with init=3D/b= in/bash >>> > and get a working bash (until I do modprobe on any module). >>> > >>> > System is a Gigabyte M55S-S3 rev 2.0 (nForce 550) with an AMD Ath= lon64 >>> > X2 5000+ and amd64-kernel architecture. kernel-sources are from >>> > kernel.org. >> >>> It seems something is wrong with forcedeth code or PCI code. >>> Adding some Cc's. >> >> I don't think it's forcedeth. forcedeth just happens to be the first >> module that get's loaded in startup. It crashes with any other modul= e >> too (I tried ohci_hcd). >> > > Ok, below is my patch, I am not sure it could fix the BUG for you, > but it could fix the WARNING. But perhaps they are related. > > Please give it a try. > Oops! Ignore the patch, it should not be correct, I will send a correct version soon. Sorry.