From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico_Wang?= Subject: Re: Notifier chains bug ? Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:08:07 +0800 Message-ID: <2375c9f91003040208g1c66f1eft6c2c1044ed995c4e@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B8C56F0.5090700@gmail.com> <2375c9f91003011924k43f03649y5b4df405d6247a79@mail.gmail.com> <5e9821061003012150y15e543cdkf6f23c3a7a47e4a3@mail.gmail.com> <20100302153651.GC4014@hack> <7f9bf5711003020755p653a0b8cq707e9b1e12b44c98@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Oleg Kutkov , LKML , Linux Kernel Network Developers To: Atis Elsts Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7f9bf5711003020755p653a0b8cq707e9b1e12b44c98@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Atis Elsts wrot= e: > I'm no expert, but IMHO for handling IP address changes you should us= e > function register_inetaddr_notifier() to register you callback and > then wait for =C2=A0NETDEV_UP and NETDEV_DOWN events. > Oh, I think you are right. Btw, please don't drop Cc's. Thanks.