From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philip Prindeville Subject: Re: [5/5] e1000e: Avoid receiver overrun interrupt bursts Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:39:10 -0600 Message-ID: <238D36BF-473B-4F9A-BDCF-97544F2FDF3F@redfish-solutions.com> References: <20170721183627.13373-5-bpoirier@suse.com> <20170919194102.h2nu72evbqhpu765@f1.synalogic.ca> <20171024172027.onfcusdcicxqnfjp@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: Benjamin Poirier , Jeff Kirsher , netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Lennart Sorensen Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171024172027.onfcusdcicxqnfjp@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > On Oct 24, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 09:41:02PM +0200, Benjamin Poirier wrote: >> On 2017/09/19 12:38, Philip Prindeville wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> We’ve been running this patchset (all 5) for about as long as they’ve been under review… about 2 months. And in a burn-in lab with heavy traffic. >>> >>> We’ve not seen a single link-flap in hundreds of ours of saturated traffic. >>> >>> Would love to see some resolution soon on this as we don’t want to ship a release with unsanctioned patches. >>> >>> Is there an estimate on when that might be? >> >> The patches have been added to Jeff Kirsher's next-queue tree. I guess >> they will be submitted for v4.15 which might be released in early >> 2018... >> http://phb-crystal-ball.org/ > > And then they will be submitted to linux-stable so this long standing > regression can be fixed, right? > Let’s hope! -Philip