From: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
To: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>,
"amitkarwar@gmail.com" <amitkarwar@gmail.com>
Cc: Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>,
Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com>,
"kvalo@codeaurora.org" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mwifiex: remove unnecessary call to memset
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 01:36:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23a4568d2e704aef83318f85e7046a8f@SC-EXCH02.marvell.com> (raw)
Hi Himanshu,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Himanshu Jha [mailto:himanshujha199640@gmail.com]
> Sent: 2017年9月11日 20:46
> To: amitkarwar@gmail.com
> Cc: Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@marvell.com>; Ganapathi Bhat
> <gbhat@marvell.com>; Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>;
> kvalo@codeaurora.org; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org;
> netdev@vger.kernel.org; Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH] mwifiex: remove unnecessary call to memset
>
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> call to memset to assign 0 value immediately after allocating memory with
> kzalloc is unnecesaary as kzalloc allocates the memory filled with 0 value.
>
Looks find to me, Thanks.
Regards,
Simon
> Semantic patch used to resolve this issue:
>
> @@
> expression e,e2; constant c;
> statement S;
> @@
>
> e = kzalloc(e2, c);
> if(e == NULL) S
> - memset(e, 0, e2);
>
> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c
> index c9d41ed..8838b88 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c
> @@ -1936,8 +1936,6 @@ mwifiex_active_scan_req_for_passive_chan(struct
> mwifiex_private *priv)
> if (!user_scan_cfg)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - memset(user_scan_cfg, 0, sizeof(*user_scan_cfg));
> -
> for (id = 0; id < MWIFIEX_USER_SCAN_CHAN_MAX; id++) {
> if (!priv->hidden_chan[id].chan_number)
> break;
> --
> 2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-12 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-12 1:36 Xinming Hu [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-09-11 12:46 [PATCH] mwifiex: remove unnecessary call to memset Himanshu Jha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23a4568d2e704aef83318f85e7046a8f@SC-EXCH02.marvell.com \
--to=huxm@marvell.com \
--cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
--cc=gbhat@marvell.com \
--cc=himanshujha199640@gmail.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishants@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).