From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: qcom/emac: fix a sizeof() typo
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:03:19 -0600
Message-ID: <23c98d90-913d-f590-2677-096bf5dc15ff@codeaurora.org>
References: <20170213110021.GA17205@mwanda> <58A19E97.6000704@bfs.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
To: wharms@bfs.de, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Return-path: <kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <58A19E97.6000704@bfs.de>
Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

walter harms wrote:
> We have a function where the argument is ignored and the rest is const ?
>
> emac_ethtool_get_regs_len seems the only user. So it would be fairly easy to
> move that into that function.
>
> @maintainer:
> Is there a deeper logic behind this ?

I don't understand the question.

The patch is valid (I have no idea how I made that mistake).

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.