From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net (relay9-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE4B54DA00; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 06:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728023045; cv=none; b=gY/Xt+4KoGngRSDCKSKRE4xVI9BFED3b56dmSLmXmSbsH2AmWPMEEc8sjj/a743BdVTJjGjeOb6gmEeHAsaZ32rcOkqBjMYOblYfDZZxSO4JBHzUQUp0lALnz4+94oDcAU6iNLmNHWn7l45+VcrQLbiaJuyTNimkjBmeawh3eZk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1728023045; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HvkxK1aTVBWtEPE6QbXJJ7jlS4gRi5139c+pO4Kp4zE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=FUtyIKpjoZUxaMcYVx1Vn6OucU0iUr711zHfBnJZQw/wSGY7yvJwkGZI/ig+FWmpKVU4uRrDjmcB0KA/GmUITpJkl9pG5g3+rFWjCaR7DMAQHHuDJJO2v1Zaz9WZMSc0cO6Ce1FqMBJDbrekIT8jCWUYAVG7byS3+7a9tcwe9G0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=d6g66t3i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="d6g66t3i" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6793FF802; Fri, 4 Oct 2024 06:23:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1728023034; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=03W9nGxDFHr9kO1XmOKBkDSteAW+ydtDQleISvuWWCk=; b=d6g66t3ipiiFrIVhtdhw4UAkXa/n2n9VnL5Jnjqe5xUr6SEykqyOiY04TLUzM6qoRrY3q3 1B1CDCdg+7V6rO+Nkl5g6yEpcatu0Nh5j/T2KlnGAKI+AZMoDiRyZQeL/imcglgPYwfbCN IGzxg859wHPXJgHRUO99BAh0xKZpUHyQcUh7dsXFqajJ2nxQq+0WiDfeJm1awZmsGNUieU zcqCZ0had7VD0LU0YgNT/gxRApe7IE9MhGVdjx1+1sr7YMqMuMa8ejV+0efDgWxsLW+Iiw a1rAevU5pjsCA+T8pdIQcBYYkI4KYGY7fPS0WaFbn0xFFqXNUd4prpZL+ZOTwA== Message-ID: <24611a2f-ff5a-47e4-af48-9faad03273d3@bootlin.com> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 08:23:52 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: convert test_xdp_features.sh to test_progs To: Martin KaFai Lau Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jakub Kicinski , Lorenzo Bianconi , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Mykola Lysenko , Shuah Khan , "David S. Miller" , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Maxime Chevallier , ebpf@linuxfoundation.org, Thomas Petazzoni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20240910-convert_xdp_tests-v2-1-a46367c9d038@bootlin.com> <64df8d41-6cfb-45a9-8337-5cc04daedb60@linux.dev> <20240914063828.7bd73c5e@kernel.org> <464e0ae0-d6e3-4da4-a157-f74260f96275@bootlin.com> <366e4392-bd00-4120-8585-a71b3952e365@linux.dev> <6d23b607-b6d6-4074-8778-c50bf3bd0b91@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Alexis_Lothor=C3=A9?= In-Reply-To: <6d23b607-b6d6-4074-8778-c50bf3bd0b91@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GND-Sasl: alexis.lothore@bootlin.com On 10/4/24 06:44, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: > On 9/24/24 6:37 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote: >> There are other .sh tests that could better use the test_progs migration. In >> particular the ones without existing test coverage. For non XDP related, >> test_tcp_check_syncookie.sh, test_flow_dissector.sh, and test_tc_edt.sh should >> be the good ones. > > I just took a closer look at the test_tc_edt.* for another reason. It seems > doing some bandwidth test which may not be a good fit (e.g. too flaky) for > test_progs. I would leave it to the bottom of the todo list for now. ACK, thanks -- Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com