netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dawid Osuchowski <dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ngai-Mint Kwan <ngai-mint.kwan@intel.com>,
	Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>,
	Pawel Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@intel.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com>,
	larysa.zaremba@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ice: Do not get coalesce settings while in reset
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 15:31:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24d3e9ed-0e56-40d6-b53f-e379855aa740@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <382a4740-cc05-4897-94e3-aac4f12b2300@linux.intel.com>

On 06.05.2024 15:30, Dawid Osuchowski wrote:
> On 02.05.2024 04:56, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Did you not add locks around reset to allow waiting instead of returning
>> -EBUSY to user space? I feel like we've been over this...
> 
> Will use the approach with ice_wait_for_reset() in next revision, thanks
> 
> --Dawid

Hey Jakub,

I went ahead with the approach of using ice_wait_for_reset() [1], 
however this resulted in a new problem in the reset flow. I want to 
prove why I think returning immediately with -EBUSY (or perhaps -EAGAIN) 
is the correct way in this particular case.

The issue has to deal with the way both the ethtool handler and the 
adapter reset flow call rtnl_lock() during operation. If we wait for 
reset completion inside of an ethtool handling function such as 
ice_get_coalesce(), the wait will always timeout due to reset being 
blocked by rtnl_lock() inside of ice_queue_set_napi() (which is called 
during reset process), and in turn we will always return -EBUSY anyways, 
with the added hang time of the timeout value (in case of [1] it's 10 
seconds).

There are other places where similar deadlock can occur, not only in 
ice_queue_set_napi() and Larysa is currently working on an extensive 
solution to this problem.

--Dawid

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240506153307.114104-1-dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com/

      reply	other threads:[~2024-05-17 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-30 18:14 [PATCH net] ice: Do not get coalesce settings while in reset Tony Nguyen
2024-05-02  2:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-06 13:30   ` Dawid Osuchowski
2024-05-17 13:31     ` Dawid Osuchowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24d3e9ed-0e56-40d6-b53f-e379855aa740@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
    --cc=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ngai-mint.kwan@intel.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pawel.chmielewski@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).