From: Dawid Osuchowski <dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ngai-Mint Kwan <ngai-mint.kwan@intel.com>,
Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>,
Pawel Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@intel.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com>,
larysa.zaremba@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ice: Do not get coalesce settings while in reset
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 15:31:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24d3e9ed-0e56-40d6-b53f-e379855aa740@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <382a4740-cc05-4897-94e3-aac4f12b2300@linux.intel.com>
On 06.05.2024 15:30, Dawid Osuchowski wrote:
> On 02.05.2024 04:56, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> Did you not add locks around reset to allow waiting instead of returning
>> -EBUSY to user space? I feel like we've been over this...
>
> Will use the approach with ice_wait_for_reset() in next revision, thanks
>
> --Dawid
Hey Jakub,
I went ahead with the approach of using ice_wait_for_reset() [1],
however this resulted in a new problem in the reset flow. I want to
prove why I think returning immediately with -EBUSY (or perhaps -EAGAIN)
is the correct way in this particular case.
The issue has to deal with the way both the ethtool handler and the
adapter reset flow call rtnl_lock() during operation. If we wait for
reset completion inside of an ethtool handling function such as
ice_get_coalesce(), the wait will always timeout due to reset being
blocked by rtnl_lock() inside of ice_queue_set_napi() (which is called
during reset process), and in turn we will always return -EBUSY anyways,
with the added hang time of the timeout value (in case of [1] it's 10
seconds).
There are other places where similar deadlock can occur, not only in
ice_queue_set_napi() and Larysa is currently working on an extensive
solution to this problem.
--Dawid
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240506153307.114104-1-dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-17 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-30 18:14 [PATCH net] ice: Do not get coalesce settings while in reset Tony Nguyen
2024-05-02 2:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-06 13:30 ` Dawid Osuchowski
2024-05-17 13:31 ` Dawid Osuchowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24d3e9ed-0e56-40d6-b53f-e379855aa740@linux.intel.com \
--to=dawid.osuchowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ngai-mint.kwan@intel.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pawel.chmielewski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).