public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>
To: "Luigi Leonardi" <leonardi@redhat.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <virtualization@lists.linux.dev>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] vsock/test: add MSG_PEEK after partial recv test
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2026 22:14:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2521971f-798d-4560-b2d8-bb540591d4b1@salutedevices.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260402-fix_peek-v1-2-ad274fcef77b@redhat.com>



02.04.2026 11:18, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
> Add a test that verifies MSG_PEEK works correctly after a partial
> recv().
> 
> This is to test a bug that was present in the `virtio_transport_stream_do_peek()`
> when computing the number of bytes to copy: After a partial read, the
> peek function didn't take into consideration the number of bytes that
> were already read. So peeking the whole buffer would cause a out-of-bounds read,
> that resulted in a -EFAULT.
> 
> This test does exactly this: do a partial recv on a buffer, then try to
> peek the whole buffer content.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> index 5bd20ccd9335caafe68e8b7a5d02a4deb3d2deec..308f9f8f30d22bec5aaa282356e400d8438fe321 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> @@ -346,6 +346,65 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
>  	return test_msg_peek_server(opts, false);
>  }
>  
> +#define PEEK_AFTER_RECV_LEN 100

Hi, may be we can just reuse MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN which was already used in MSG_PEEK tests ?

Thanks

> +
> +static void test_stream_peek_after_recv_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
> +{
> +	unsigned char buf[PEEK_AFTER_RECV_LEN];
> +	int fd;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	fd = vsock_stream_connect(opts->peer_cid, opts->peer_port);
> +	if (fd < 0) {
> +		perror("connect");
> +		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < sizeof(buf); i++)
> +		buf[i] = (unsigned char)i;
> +
> +	control_expectln("SRVREADY");
> +
> +	send_buf(fd, buf, sizeof(buf), 0, sizeof(buf));
> +
> +	close(fd);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_stream_peek_after_recv_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
> +{
> +	unsigned char buf[PEEK_AFTER_RECV_LEN];
> +	int half = PEEK_AFTER_RECV_LEN / 2;
> +	ssize_t ret;
> +	int fd;
> +
> +	fd = vsock_stream_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, opts->peer_port, NULL);
> +	if (fd < 0) {
> +		perror("accept");
> +		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> +	}
> +
> +	control_writeln("SRVREADY");
> +
> +	/* Partial recv to advance offset within the skb */
> +	recv_buf(fd, buf, half, 0, half);
> +
> +	/* Try to peek more than what remains: should return only 'half'
> +	 * bytes. Note: we can't use recv_buf() because it loops until
> +	 * all requested bytes are returned.
> +	 */
> +	ret = recv(fd, buf, sizeof(buf), MSG_PEEK);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		perror("recv");
> +		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> +	} else if (ret != half) {
> +		fprintf(stderr, "MSG_PEEK after partial recv returned %d (expected %d)\n",
> +			ret, half);
> +		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> +	}
> +
> +	close(fd);
> +}
> +
>  #define SOCK_BUF_SIZE (2 * 1024 * 1024)
>  #define SOCK_BUF_SIZE_SMALL (64 * 1024)
>  #define MAX_MSG_PAGES 4
> @@ -2520,6 +2579,11 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
>  		.run_client = test_stream_tx_credit_bounds_client,
>  		.run_server = test_stream_tx_credit_bounds_server,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "SOCK_STREAM MSG_PEEK after partial recv",
> +		.run_client = test_stream_peek_after_recv_client,
> +		.run_server = test_stream_peek_after_recv_server,
> +	},
>  	{},
>  };
>  
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-05 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02  8:18 [PATCH net 0/2] vsock/virtio: fix MSG_PEEK calculation on bytes to copy Luigi Leonardi
2026-04-02  8:18 ` [PATCH net 1/2] vsock/virtio: fix MSG_PEEK ignoring skb offset when calculating " Luigi Leonardi
2026-04-02 13:08   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-04-05 19:22   ` Arseniy Krasnov
2026-04-02  8:18 ` [PATCH net 2/2] vsock/test: add MSG_PEEK after partial recv test Luigi Leonardi
2026-04-02 13:28   ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-04-03 11:40     ` Luigi Leonardi
2026-04-05 19:14   ` Arseniy Krasnov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2521971f-798d-4560-b2d8-bb540591d4b1@salutedevices.com \
    --to=avkrasnov@salutedevices.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=leonardi@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox