From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH] bgmac: Remove all offloading features, including GRO. Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:54:50 -0700 Message-ID: <252FFED5-906E-4D1B-9E87-679D0CE801D4@gmail.com> References: <20170915222218.6613-1-rosenp@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Rosen Penev , netdev@vger.kernel.org, zajec5@gmail.com, nbd@nbd.name Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]:45819 "EHLO mail-pg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750871AbdIOWyz (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:54:55 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 188so2284625pgb.2 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:54:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170915222218.6613-1-rosenp@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On September 15, 2017 3:22:18 PM PDT, Rosen Penev wrot= e: >On a linksys E1200v1 (actually a crossflashed E1000v2), the offloading >features give no measurable benefit to speed or latency=2E Furthermore, >disabling GRO actually improves iperf performance by a whoppimg 3mbps=2E Do you have a way to generate gigabit tests and see what results you are g= etting? We probably are not going to see a 30% improvement just by extrapol= ation=2E --=20 Florian