* Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls
@ 2014-02-06 23:08 David Howells
2014-02-06 23:12 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2014-02-06 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem; +Cc: dhowells, netdev, linux-afs
Hi Dave,
I would like to add some sysctls for RxRPC to configure timeouts and
suchlike. Should I use the pernet stuff to make it namespaceable? I notice
that most net/ dirs don't use this yet.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls
2014-02-06 23:08 Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls David Howells
@ 2014-02-06 23:12 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2014-02-06 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: dhowells, davem, netdev, linux-afs
I also noticed this in net/core/sysctl_net_core.c:
static struct ctl_table net_core_table[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_NET <---
{
But isn't the content of the net/core/ directory contingent on CONFIG_NET=y in
net/Makefile, rendering this redundant?
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-06 23:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-06 23:08 Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls David Howells
2014-02-06 23:12 ` David Howells
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox