From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 23:12:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25420.1391728330@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25347.1391728096@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
I also noticed this in net/core/sysctl_net_core.c:
static struct ctl_table net_core_table[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_NET <---
{
But isn't the content of the net/core/ directory contingent on CONFIG_NET=y in
net/Makefile, rendering this redundant?
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-06 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 23:08 Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls David Howells
2014-02-06 23:12 ` David Howells [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25420.1391728330@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox