Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls

public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls
@ 2014-02-06 23:08 David Howells
  2014-02-06 23:12 ` David Howells
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2014-02-06 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: davem; +Cc: dhowells, netdev, linux-afs

Hi Dave,

I would like to add some sysctls for RxRPC to configure timeouts and
suchlike.  Should I use the pernet stuff to make it namespaceable?  I notice
that most net/ dirs don't use this yet.

David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls
  2014-02-06 23:08 Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls David Howells
@ 2014-02-06 23:12 ` David Howells
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2014-02-06 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: dhowells, davem, netdev, linux-afs


I also noticed this in net/core/sysctl_net_core.c:

	static struct ctl_table net_core_table[] = {
	#ifdef CONFIG_NET  <---
		{

But isn't the content of the net/core/ directory contingent on CONFIG_NET=y in
net/Makefile, rendering this redundant?

David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-06 23:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-06 23:08 Should I use the pernet stuff for rxrpc sysctls David Howells
2014-02-06 23:12 ` David Howells

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox